Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNSCX vs WCMLX
PNSCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts PNSCX vs WCMLX
Putnam Small Cap Growth C
Price$61.92
Change+$0.57 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.82B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.15
Change+$0.06 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.26M
PNSCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNSCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNSCX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNSCX has more cash in the bank: 2.82B vs. WCMLX (41.3M). PNSCX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . PNSCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: PNSCX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). PNSCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. PNSCX (40.00). PNSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: PNSCX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). PNSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.48 vs. WCMLX (-3.04). PNSCX return over 5 years is better than : 9.30 vs. WCMLX (-0.83).
| PNSCX | WCMLX | PNSCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.99 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.79 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.109 | 1.788 | 286% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.82B | 41.3M | 6,818% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.48 | -3.04 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.22 | 21.43 | 234% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.30 | -0.83 | -1,116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.52 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement