Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNSCX vs WCMLX
PNSCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts PNSCX vs WCMLX
Putnam Small Cap Growth C
Price$61.20
Change-$0.32 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.93B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.01
Change-$0.07 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.19M
PNSCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNSCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNSCX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNSCX has more cash in the bank: 2.94B vs. WCMLX (44.2M). PNSCX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . PNSCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: PNSCX (23 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). PNSCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. PNSCX (40.00). PNSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: PNSCX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). PNSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.49 vs. WCMLX (8.82). PNSCX return over 5 years is better than : 20.79 vs. WCMLX (16.58).
| PNSCX | WCMLX | PNSCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.99 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.79 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.430 | 1.711 | 259% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.94B | 44.2M | 6,640% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.49 | 8.82 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.41 | 13.34 | 318% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.79 | 16.58 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.87 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement