Ad is loading...
PNSCX vs WCMLX
PNSCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts PNSCX vs WCMLX
Putnam Small Cap Growth C
Price$52.37
Change+$1.14 (+2.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.54B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.01
Change+$0.22 (+2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.54M
PNSCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNSCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNSCX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNSCX has more cash in the bank: 2.54B vs. WCMLX (38.5M). PNSCX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . PNSCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: PNSCX (23 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). PNSCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.86). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. PNSCX (40.00). PNSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: PNSCX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). PNSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.59 vs. WCMLX (-12.84). PNSCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.62 vs. WCMLX (22.89).
| PNSCX | WCMLX | PNSCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.99 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.86 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.037 | -16.096 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.54B | 38.5M | 6,590% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.59 | -12.84 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.00 | -5.68 | -334% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.62 | 22.89 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.27 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...