Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNSCX vs WCMLX
PNSCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts PNSCX vs WCMLX
Putnam Small Cap Growth C
Price$56.36
Change-$0.26 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.77B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.91
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.34M
PNSCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNSCX vs. WCMLX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNSCX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNSCX has more cash in the bank: 2.77B vs. WCMLX (42.3M). PNSCX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . PNSCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: PNSCX (23 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). PNSCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. PNSCX (40.00). PNSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: PNSCX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). PNSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.37 vs. WCMLX (-5.25). PNSCX return over 5 years is better than : 29.12 vs. WCMLX (18.61).
| PNSCX | WCMLX | PNSCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.99 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.79 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.887 | -7.309 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.77B | 42.3M | 6,553% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.37 | -5.25 | -83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.07 | 15.95 | 276% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.12 | 18.61 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers