Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNSCX vs WCMLX
PNSCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts PNSCX vs WCMLX
Putnam Small Cap Growth C
Price$65.55
Change+$0.06 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.06B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.90
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.16M
PNSCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNSCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNSCX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNSCX has more cash in the bank: 3.06B vs. WCMLX (44.2M). PNSCX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . PNSCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: PNSCX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). PNSCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. PNSCX (40.00). PNSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: PNSCX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). PNSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.94 vs. WCMLX (6.19). PNSCX return over 5 years is better than : 27.55 vs. WCMLX (21.82).
| PNSCX | WCMLX | PNSCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.99 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.79 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.271 | 8.087 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.06B | 44.2M | 6,930% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.94 | 6.19 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.18 | 31.13 | 197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.55 | 21.82 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.38 | N/A | - |