Ad is loading...
PNSCX vs WCMLX
PNSCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts PNSCX vs WCMLX
Putnam Small Cap Growth C
Price$54.24
Change+$1.21 (+2.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.65B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$10.81
Change-$0.86 (-7.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.58M
PNSCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNSCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNSCX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNSCX has more cash in the bank: 2.65B vs. WCMLX (41.6M). PNSCX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . PNSCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: PNSCX (23 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). PNSCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.86). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. PNSCX (40.00). PNSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: PNSCX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). PNSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.86 vs. WCMLX (-11.40). PNSCX return over 5 years is better than : 67.13 vs. WCMLX (59.64).
| PNSCX | WCMLX | PNSCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.99 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.86 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.981 | -11.120 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.65B | 41.6M | 6,363% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.86 | -11.40 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.88 | -7.82 | -165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.13 | 59.64 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...