Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNSCX vs WCMLX
PNSCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts PNSCX vs WCMLX
Putnam Small Cap Growth C
Price$60.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.92B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.89
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.46M
PNSCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNSCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNSCX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNSCX has more cash in the bank: 2.92B vs. WCMLX (43.5M). PNSCX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . PNSCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: PNSCX (23 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). PNSCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. PNSCX (40.00). PNSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: PNSCX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). PNSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.20 vs. WCMLX (4.04). PNSCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.43 vs. WCMLX (24.30).
| PNSCX | WCMLX | PNSCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.99 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.79 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.039 | 0.233 | 1,302% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.92B | 43.5M | 6,720% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.20 | 4.04 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.60 | 24.06 | 231% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.43 | 24.30 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.38 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement