PNXGF
Price
$8.92
Change
-$0.09 (-1.00%)
Updated
Oct 23 closing price
Capitalization
9.04B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
SLLDY
Price
$10.99
Change
+$0.05 (+0.46%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
11.34B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PNXGF vs SLLDY

Header iconPNXGF vs SLLDY Comparison
Open Charts PNXGF vs SLLDYBanner chart's image
Phoenix Group
Price$8.92
Change-$0.09 (-1.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization9.04B
Sanlam
Price$10.99
Change+$0.05 (+0.46%)
Volume$9.93K
Capitalization11.34B
PNXGF vs SLLDY Comparison Chart in %
PNXGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLLDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PNXGF vs. SLLDY commentary
Oct 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNXGF is a Hold and SLLDY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 26, 2025
Stock price -- (PNXGF: $8.92 vs. SLLDY: $10.99)
Brand notoriety: PNXGF and SLLDY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PNXGF: 24% vs. SLLDY: 43%
Market capitalization -- PNXGF: $9.04B vs. SLLDY: $11.34B
PNXGF [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $9.04B. SLLDY’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $11.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $153.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $25.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PNXGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLLDY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PNXGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLLDY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLLDY is a better buy in the long-term than PNXGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PNXGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLLDY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PNXGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLLDY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLLDY is a better buy in the short-term than PNXGF.

Price Growth

PNXGF (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -1.00% price change this week, while SLLDY (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +5.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+0.93% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLLDY($11.3B) has a higher market cap than PNXGF($9.04B). PNXGF YTD gains are higher at: 41.363 vs. SLLDY (27.903).
PNXGFSLLDYPNXGF / SLLDY
Capitalization9.04B11.3B80%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD41.36327.903148%
P/E RatioN/A10.27-
RevenueN/A254B-
Total CashN/A41.9B-
Total DebtN/A19.3B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PNXGF vs SLLDY: Fundamental Ratings
PNXGF
SLLDY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9927
SMR RATING
1..100
98100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5044
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8058
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
45n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLLDY's Valuation (40) in the null industry is in the same range as PNXGF (50). This means that SLLDY’s stock grew similarly to PNXGF’s over the last 12 months.

SLLDY's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PNXGF (99). This means that SLLDY’s stock grew significantly faster than PNXGF’s over the last 12 months.

PNXGF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as SLLDY (100). This means that PNXGF’s stock grew similarly to SLLDY’s over the last 12 months.

SLLDY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as PNXGF (50). This means that SLLDY’s stock grew similarly to PNXGF’s over the last 12 months.

SLLDY's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as PNXGF (80). This means that SLLDY’s stock grew similarly to PNXGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PNXGFSLLDY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PNXGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLLDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MST6.540.22
+3.42%
Defiance Leveraged Long + Inc MSTR ETF
RWR101.680.28
+0.28%
SPDR® Dow Jones® REIT ETF
CEV10.12N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust
CAPE32.39N/A
-0.01%
DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF
GBLD18.51N/A
-0.02%
Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF

PNXGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PNXGF and PUKPF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PNXGF and PUKPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNXGF
1D Price
Change %
PNXGF100%
N/A
PUKPF - PNXGF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PWCDF - PNXGF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
SLLDY - PNXGF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
UTGN - PNXGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDHOY - PNXGF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
More

SLLDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLLDY and MFC have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLLDY and MFC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLLDY
1D Price
Change %
SLLDY100%
+0.49%
MFC - SLLDY
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
LNC - SLLDY
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.47%
PUK - SLLDY
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
AAGIY - SLLDY
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
PNGAY - SLLDY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More