PORT
Price
$11.47
Change
+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
75.08M
QETAU
Price
$10.71
Change
+$0.11 (+1.04%)
Updated
Mar 27 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Ad is loading...

PORT vs QETAU

Header iconPORT vs QETAU Comparison
Open Charts PORT vs QETAUBanner chart's image
Southport Acquisition
Price$11.47
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Volume$221
Capitalization75.08M
Quetta Acquisition
Price$10.71
Change+$0.11 (+1.04%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
PORT vs QETAU Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PORT vs. QETAU commentary
Apr 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PORT is a StrongBuy and QETAU is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 06, 2025
Stock price -- (PORT: $11.47 vs. QETAU: $10.71)
Brand notoriety: PORT and QETAU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PORT: 112% vs. QETAU: 57%
Market capitalization -- PORT: $75.08M vs. QETAU: $0
PORT [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $75.08M. QETAU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $3.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PORT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQETAU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PORT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QETAU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PORT and QETAU are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

PORT (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +1.01% price change this week, while QETAU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

PORT is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2022.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.29% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PORT YTD gains are higher at: 2.962 vs. QETAU (0.563).
PORTQETAUPORT / QETAU
Capitalization75.1MN/A-
EBITDA-12.02MN/A-
Gain YTD2.9620.563526%
P/E Ratio39.96N/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash2.35MN/A-
Total Debt60.2KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HLEMX35.93N/A
N/A
Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Advisor
FDETX22.31N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Capital Development O
RYZAX104.06N/A
N/A
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Value H
MCEGX12.34N/A
N/A
BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Inv C
RCEAX9.66N/A
N/A
RBC China Equity A

PORT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PORT has been loosely correlated with YOTA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PORT jumps, then YOTA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PORT
1D Price
Change %
PORT100%
N/A
YOTA - PORT
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
BEEP - PORT
34%
Loosely correlated
-4.61%
PWUPU - PORT
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSTUF - PORT
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VMCAF - PORT
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
More