POSC
Price
$1.57
Change
-$0.08 (-4.85%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
49.3M
RSMDF
Price
$16.63
Change
+$0.06 (+0.36%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
40.32B
55 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

POSC vs RSMDF

Header iconPOSC vs RSMDF Comparison
Open Charts POSC vs RSMDFBanner chart's image
Positron
Price$1.57
Change-$0.08 (-4.85%)
Volume$9.77K
Capitalization49.3M
Resmed
Price$16.63
Change+$0.06 (+0.36%)
Volume$159
Capitalization40.32B
POSC vs RSMDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
POSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
POSC vs. RSMDF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is POSC is a Hold and RSMDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (POSC: $1.57 vs. RSMDF: $16.57)
Brand notoriety: POSC and RSMDF are both not notable
POSC represents the Medical/Nursing Services, while RSMDF is part of the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: POSC: 61% vs. RSMDF: 3%
Market capitalization -- POSC: $49.3M vs. RSMDF: $40.32B
POSC [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $49.3M. RSMDF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $40.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $228.64B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $169.86B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.64B. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $10.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

POSC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRSMDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • POSC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RSMDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, POSC is a better buy in the long-term than RSMDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

POSC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSMDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • POSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RSMDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RSMDF is a better buy in the short-term than POSC.

Price Growth

POSC (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -15.14% price change this week, while RSMDF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.89%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

RSMDF is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (+0.48% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+0.60% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSMDF($40.3B) has a higher market cap than POSC($49.3M). RSMDF has higher P/E ratio than POSC: RSMDF (17.49) vs POSC (0.09). POSC YTD gains are higher at: 55.446 vs. RSMDF (-27.058).
POSCRSMDFPOSC / RSMDF
Capitalization49.3M40.3B0%
EBITDAN/A1.92B-
Gain YTD55.446-27.058-205%
P/E Ratio0.0917.491%
RevenueN/A5.15B-
Total CashN/A1.21B-
Total DebtN/A852M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
POSC vs RSMDF: Fundamental Ratings
POSC
RSMDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
434
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
55100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5990
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

POSC's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as RSMDF (29). This means that POSC’s stock grew similarly to RSMDF’s over the last 12 months.

POSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RSMDF (100). This means that POSC’s stock grew somewhat faster than RSMDF’s over the last 12 months.

POSC's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RSMDF (100). This means that POSC’s stock grew similarly to RSMDF’s over the last 12 months.

POSC's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as RSMDF (90). This means that POSC’s stock grew similarly to RSMDF’s over the last 12 months.

POSC's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RSMDF (100). This means that POSC’s stock grew similarly to RSMDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
POSCRSMDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
POSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAURY44.370.37
+0.84%
Marui Group Co., Ltd.
ASBFF29.71N/A
N/A
Associated British Foods plc
DAWIF11.42N/A
N/A
Daiwa Industires Ltd
TETEF12.08N/A
N/A
Technology & Telecommunication Acquisition Corporation
FTIDF0.18N/A
N/A
FTI Foodtech International, Inc.

POSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that POSC and SLDX have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that POSC and SLDX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To POSC
1D Price
Change %
POSC100%
-4.71%
SLDX - POSC
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMED - POSC
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
RSMDF - POSC
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSCF - POSC
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PFGTF - POSC
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RSMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSMDF and NAOV have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSMDF and NAOV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSMDF
1D Price
Change %
RSMDF100%
N/A
NAOV - RSMDF
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.30%
RMD - RSMDF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.33%
PFGTF - RSMDF
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
POSC - RSMDF
9%
Poorly correlated
-4.71%
SAFLF - RSMDF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More