PPBN vs PPERF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PPBN is a Hold and PPERF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PPBN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePPERF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- PPBN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PPERF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PPBN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PPERF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PPBN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PPERF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
PPBN (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PPERF (@Regional Banks) price change was -7.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.55%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-2.30% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| PPBN | PPERF | PPBN / PPERF | |
| Capitalization | 45M | 34.9B | 0% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.042 | -5.284 | -644% |
| P/E Ratio | 4.73 | 15.41 | 31% |
| Revenue | 38.8M | 116.68T | 0% |
| Total Cash | 4.4M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 10M | 108.28T | 0% |
PPBN | PPERF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 1 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 9 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PPBN's Valuation (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PPERF (93). This means that PPBN’s stock grew significantly faster than PPERF’s over the last 12 months.
PPERF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PPBN (66). This means that PPERF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PPBN’s over the last 12 months.
PPERF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PPBN (48). This means that PPERF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PPBN’s over the last 12 months.
PPBN's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as PPERF (62). This means that PPBN’s stock grew similarly to PPERF’s over the last 12 months.
PPBN's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PPERF (76). This means that PPBN’s stock grew somewhat faster than PPERF’s over the last 12 months.
| PPBN | PPERF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 34% | 1 day ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 37% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 41% | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 40% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 54% | 25 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 31% | 3 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 40% | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PSFD | 32.98 | -0.05 | -0.15% |
| Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF | |||
| DOCT | 39.30 | -0.51 | -1.28% |
| FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Oct | |||
| OUNZ | 25.02 | -0.49 | -1.92% |
| VanEck Merk Gold Trust | |||
| IWB | 321.56 | -10.23 | -3.08% |
| iShares Russell 1000 ETF | |||
| TSL | 20.14 | -2.42 | -10.73% |
| GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF | |||
PPBN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PPBN and BLX have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PPBN and BLX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PPBN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPBN | 100% | N/A | ||
| BLX - PPBN | 20% Poorly correlated | -3.84% | ||
| PVBK - PPBN | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PTBRY - PPBN | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.52% | ||
| PPERF - PPBN | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PTBS - PPBN | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.54% | ||
More | ||||
PPERF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PPERF and CEFC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PPERF and CEFC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PPERF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPERF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CEFC - PPERF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| UOVEF - PPERF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RSNHF - PPERF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PPERY - PPERF | 19% Poorly correlated | -4.99% | ||
| PTBRY - PPERF | 18% Poorly correlated | -2.52% | ||
More | ||||