Advertisement
PPCCY vs QBEIF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PPCCY is a Hold and QBEIF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PPCCY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileQBEIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- PPCCY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- QBEIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PPCCY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QBEIF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PPCCY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
- QBEIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
PPCCY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -3.79% price change this week, while QBEIF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.60%.
Reported Earning Dates
PPCCY is expected to report earnings on Mar 27, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.46% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| PPCCY | QBEIF | PPCCY / QBEIF | |
| Capitalization | 26B | 15.8B | 165% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.074 | 23.193 | 82% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.67 | 19.69 | 34% |
| Revenue | 454B | 13.4B | 3,388% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 833M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 3.05B | - |
PPCCY | QBEIF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 91 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 4 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PPCCY's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as QBEIF (30). This means that PPCCY’s stock grew similarly to QBEIF’s over the last 12 months.
QBEIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as PPCCY (5). This means that QBEIF’s stock grew similarly to PPCCY’s over the last 12 months.
QBEIF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as PPCCY (100). This means that QBEIF’s stock grew similarly to PPCCY’s over the last 12 months.
PPCCY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as QBEIF (49). This means that PPCCY’s stock grew similarly to QBEIF’s over the last 12 months.
PPCCY's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QBEIF (65). This means that PPCCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than QBEIF’s over the last 12 months.
| PPCCY | QBEIF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 35% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 41% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 37% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 46% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 29% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 46% |
Advertisement
PPCCY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PPCCY and QBEIF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PPCCY and QBEIF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PPCCY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPCCY | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| QBEIF - PPCCY | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MSADY - PPCCY | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.63% | ||
| PINXY - PPCCY | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IAUGF - PPCCY | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NHOLF - PPCCY | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
QBEIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QBEIF and PPCCY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QBEIF and PPCCY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QBEIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBEIF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PPCCY - QBEIF | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.43% | ||
| SMPNY - QBEIF | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.33% | ||
| SCRYY - QBEIF | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.94% | ||
| SSREY - QBEIF | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.30% | ||
| SSREF - QBEIF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||