It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PPLL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePTBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PPLL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PTBS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
PPLL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +8.61% price change this week, while PTBS (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.
PTBS is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2023.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
PPLL | PTBS | PPLL / PTBS | |
Capitalization | N/A | 40.1M | - |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 4.646 | 10.395 | 45% |
P/E Ratio | 7.84 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 18.6M | 14.3M | 130% |
Total Cash | N/A | 1.57M | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 1.22M | - |
PPLL | PTBS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 41 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 50 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 40 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PTBS's Valuation (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PPLL (69). This means that PTBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PPLL’s over the last 12 months.
PPLL's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as PTBS (41). This means that PPLL’s stock grew similarly to PTBS’s over the last 12 months.
PPLL's SMR Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as PTBS (50). This means that PPLL’s stock grew similarly to PTBS’s over the last 12 months.
PPLL's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as PTBS (48). This means that PPLL’s stock grew similarly to PTBS’s over the last 12 months.
PTBS's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as PPLL (51). This means that PTBS’s stock grew similarly to PPLL’s over the last 12 months.
PPLL | PTBS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago21% | 3 days ago33% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago10% | 3 days ago43% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago23% | 3 days ago33% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago12% | 3 days ago32% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago16% | 3 days ago27% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago14% | 3 days ago47% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago40% | 14 days ago39% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago10% | 7 days ago32% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago14% | 3 days ago42% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago9% | 3 days ago51% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
UST | 42.18 | 0.05 | +0.12% |
ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury | |||
SPSK | 18.08 | -0.04 | -0.22% |
SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF | |||
SUSL | 106.21 | -0.29 | -0.27% |
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF | |||
IYW | 165.17 | -0.99 | -0.60% |
iShares US Technology ETF | |||
FILL | 22.83 | -0.16 | -0.70% |
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that PPLL and CHBH have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PPLL and CHBH's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PPLL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PPLL | 100% | N/A | ||
CHBH - PPLL | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MBBC - PPLL | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
PTBS - PPLL | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.54% | ||
PPBN - PPLL | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PVBK - PPLL | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that PTBS and NRIM have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PTBS and NRIM's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PTBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PTBS | 100% | -1.54% | ||
NRIM - PTBS | 23% Poorly correlated | -5.76% | ||
TSBK - PTBS | 22% Poorly correlated | -4.15% | ||
EFSC - PTBS | 22% Poorly correlated | -4.76% | ||
GBOOF - PTBS | 20% Poorly correlated | +6.63% | ||
WCFB - PTBS | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |