Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PPSFX vs RMFCX
PPSFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PPSFX vs RMFCX
Principal Large Cap Value III R3
Price$21.46
Change+$0.11 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.55B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
PPSFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PPSFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PPSFX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. PPSFX (3.55B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PPSFX: RMFCX (1.27) vs PPSFX (0.87). PPSFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PPSFX (25 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PPSFX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PPSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.10 vs. RMFCX (31.00). PPSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: PPSFX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. PPSFX (5.54). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.83 vs. PPSFX (46.83).
| PPSFX | RMFCX | PPSFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.91 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.91 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.506 | 9.596 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.55B | 109B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.27 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.54 | 11.47 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.64 | 29.27 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.83 | 61.83 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.05 | 79.21 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement