Ad is loading...
PPSFX vs RMFCX
PPSFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PPSFX vs RMFCX
Principal Large Cap Value III R3
Price$19.38
Change+$1.30 (+7.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.18B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.56
Change+$3.33 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.19B
PPSFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PPSFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PPSFX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 92.2B vs. PPSFX (3.18B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PPSFX: RMFCX (1.34) vs PPSFX (0.90). PPSFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PPSFX (24 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PPSFX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PPSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.10 vs. RMFCX (31.00). PPSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: PPSFX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.43 vs. PPSFX (-11.56). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. PPSFX (30.62).
| PPSFX | RMFCX | PPSFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.91 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.91 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.111 | -7.697 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.18B | 92.2B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.34 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.56 | -4.43 | 261% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.99 | -0.65 | 1,691% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.62 | 45.42 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.45 | 46.29 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...