Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PPSFX vs RMFCX
PPSFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PPSFX vs RMFCX
Principal Large Cap Value III R3
Price$21.79
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.52B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.20
Change-$0.05 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
PPSFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PPSFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PPSFX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. PPSFX (3.52B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PPSFX: RMFCX (1.24) vs PPSFX (0.84). PPSFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PPSFX (25 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PPSFX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PPSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.10 vs. RMFCX (31.00). PPSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: PPSFX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.75 vs. PPSFX (1.10). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 58.84 vs. PPSFX (39.46).
| PPSFX | RMFCX | PPSFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.91 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.91 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.178 | 12.804 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.52B | 111B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.24 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.10 | 6.75 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.92 | 33.93 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.46 | 58.84 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.71 | 96.04 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement