Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PPSFX vs RMFCX
PPSFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PPSFX vs RMFCX
Principal Large Cap Value III R3
Price$20.04
Change-$0.39 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.6B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$56.15
Change-$0.84 (-1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.75B
PPSFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PPSFX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PPSFX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. PPSFX (3.6B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PPSFX: RMFCX (1.37) vs PPSFX (0.93). PPSFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PPSFX (24 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PPSFX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PPSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.10 vs. RMFCX (31.00). PPSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: PPSFX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.25 vs. PPSFX (-1.45). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.57 vs. PPSFX (44.87).
| PPSFX | RMFCX | PPSFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.91 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.91 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.442 | 3.181 | 14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.6B | 105B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.37 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.45 | 5.25 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.64 | 20.45 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.87 | 59.57 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.03 | 62.18 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement