Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PPSFX vs RMFCX
PPSFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PPSFX vs RMFCX
Principal Large Cap Value III R3
Price$20.46
Change-$0.23 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.51B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.52
Change-$0.44 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.6B
PPSFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PPSFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PPSFX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. PPSFX (3.51B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PPSFX: RMFCX (1.31) vs PPSFX (0.90). PPSFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PPSFX (25 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PPSFX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PPSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.10 vs. RMFCX (31.00). PPSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: PPSFX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. PPSFX (1.95). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.85 vs. PPSFX (40.54).
| PPSFX | RMFCX | PPSFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.91 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.91 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.721 | 6.021 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.51B | 107B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.31 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.95 | 8.70 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.72 | 28.43 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.54 | 59.85 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.58 | 69.75 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement