Ad is loading...
PPSRX vs RMFCX
PPSRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PPSRX vs RMFCX
Principal Large Cap Value III R5
Price$18.81
Change+$0.14 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.49B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.11
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.63B
PPSRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PPSRX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PPSRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. PPSRX (3.49B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PPSRX: RMFCX (1.37) vs PPSRX (1.13). PPSRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PPSRX (24 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PPSRX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PPSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.10 vs. RMFCX (31.00). PPSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: PPSRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.35 vs. PPSRX (-3.03). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.16 vs. PPSRX (39.72).
| PPSRX | RMFCX | PPSRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.91 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.013 | 1.270 | -237% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.49B | 101B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.37 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.03 | 5.35 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.49 | 17.29 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.72 | 56.16 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.60 | 60.33 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...