Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PPSRX vs RMFCX
PPSRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PPSRX vs RMFCX
Principal Large Cap Value III R5
Price$19.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.44B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$58.27
Change+$0.43 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.24B
PPSRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PPSRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PPSRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. PPSRX (3.44B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PPSRX: RMFCX (1.31) vs PPSRX (1.10). PPSRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PPSRX (25 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PPSRX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PPSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.10 vs. RMFCX (31.00). PPSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: PPSRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.64 vs. PPSRX (2.11). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.87 vs. PPSRX (45.68).
| PPSRX | RMFCX | PPSRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.91 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.922 | 7.403 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.44B | 106B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.31 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.11 | 9.64 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.94 | 26.42 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.68 | 63.87 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.32 | 76.11 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers