PRBZF
Price
$52.79
Change
-$0.85 (-1.58%)
Updated
Apr 8 closing price
Capitalization
2.98B
RSGUF
Price
$3.70
Change
-$0.01 (-0.27%)
Updated
Apr 8 closing price
Capitalization
501.75M
Ad is loading...

PRBZF vs RSGUF

Header iconPRBZF vs RSGUF Comparison
Open Charts PRBZF vs RSGUFBanner chart's image
Premium Brands Holding
Price$52.79
Change-$0.85 (-1.58%)
Volume$2.63K
Capitalization2.98B
Rogers Sugar
Price$3.70
Change-$0.01 (-0.27%)
Volume$2.16K
Capitalization501.75M
PRBZF vs RSGUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PRBZF vs. RSGUF commentary
Apr 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRBZF is a Hold and RSGUF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 09, 2025
Stock price -- (PRBZF: $52.79 vs. RSGUF: $3.70)
Brand notoriety: PRBZF and RSGUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PRBZF: 182% vs. RSGUF: 11%
Market capitalization -- PRBZF: $2.98B vs. RSGUF: $501.75M
PRBZF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $2.98B. RSGUF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $501.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PRBZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRSGUF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PRBZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RSGUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RSGUF is a better buy in the long-term than PRBZF.

Price Growth

PRBZF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -1.91% price change this week, while RSGUF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -2.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -3.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-3.93% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRBZF($2.98B) has a higher market cap than RSGUF($502M). PRBZF has higher P/E ratio than RSGUF: PRBZF (37.77) vs RSGUF (12.55). PRBZF YTD gains are higher at: -4.608 vs. RSGUF (-9.609). PRBZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 447M vs. RSGUF (119M). PRBZF has more cash in the bank: 13.8M vs. RSGUF (5.83M). RSGUF has less debt than PRBZF: RSGUF (445M) vs PRBZF (2.39B). PRBZF has higher revenues than RSGUF: PRBZF (5.46B) vs RSGUF (1.13B).
PRBZFRSGUFPRBZF / RSGUF
Capitalization2.98B502M593%
EBITDA447M119M376%
Gain YTD-4.608-9.60948%
P/E Ratio37.7712.55301%
Revenue5.46B1.13B482%
Total Cash13.8M5.83M237%
Total Debt2.39B445M538%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PRBZF vs RSGUF: Fundamental Ratings
PRBZF
RSGUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9070
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10064
SMR RATING
1..100
8254
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7171
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7831
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
501

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RSGUF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as PRBZF (18). This means that RSGUF’s stock grew similarly to PRBZF’s over the last 12 months.

RSGUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRBZF (100). This means that RSGUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRBZF’s over the last 12 months.

RSGUF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as PRBZF (82). This means that RSGUF’s stock grew similarly to PRBZF’s over the last 12 months.

RSGUF's Price Growth Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as PRBZF (71). This means that RSGUF’s stock grew similarly to PRBZF’s over the last 12 months.

RSGUF's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRBZF (78). This means that RSGUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRBZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IGLGX16.32N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Global Equity A
NRGSX54.21N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
SSCDX14.40N/A
N/A
Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth I
BHEIX25.34N/A
N/A
BlackRock High Equity Income K
DESUX19.09N/A
N/A
DWS ESG Core Equity R6

RSGUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSGUF and LW have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSGUF and LW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSGUF
1D Price
Change %
RSGUF100%
-0.35%
LW - RSGUF
32%
Poorly correlated
-7.18%
DAR - RSGUF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.26%
CIADY - RSGUF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.14%
SAPIF - RSGUF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
PRBZF - RSGUF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
More