Advertisement
PRDSF vs SFRGY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRDSF is a Hold and SFRGY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PRDSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFRGY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PRDSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SFRGY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PRDSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFRGY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PRDSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SFRGY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
PRDSF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) experienced а +1.38% price change this week, while SFRGY (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) price change was -2.71% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was -3.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.87%.
Reported Earning Dates
SFRGY is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (-3.17% weekly)The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.
| PRDSF | SFRGY | PRDSF / SFRGY | |
| Capitalization | 15B | 1.43B | 1,053% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 77.5M | - |
| Gain YTD | -26.592 | 20.112 | -132% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.39 | 112.22 | 14% |
| Revenue | N/A | 986M | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 207M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 701M | - |
PRDSF | SFRGY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PRDSF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFRGY (68). This means that PRDSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFRGY’s over the last 12 months.
PRDSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as SFRGY (100). This means that PRDSF’s stock grew similarly to SFRGY’s over the last 12 months.
PRDSF's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as SFRGY (94). This means that PRDSF’s stock grew similarly to SFRGY’s over the last 12 months.
SFRGY's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as PRDSF (60). This means that SFRGY’s stock grew similarly to PRDSF’s over the last 12 months.
SFRGY's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRDSF (89). This means that SFRGY’s stock grew significantly faster than PRDSF’s over the last 12 months.
| PRDSF | SFRGY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 20 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 76% |
Advertisement
PRDSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRDSF has been loosely correlated with PRDSY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRDSF jumps, then PRDSY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PRDSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRDSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PRDSY - PRDSF | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| PPRUY - PRDSF | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.61% | ||
| SWGAY - PRDSF | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.87% | ||
| PPRUF - PRDSF | 4% Poorly correlated | -4.36% | ||
| SFRGY - PRDSF | 4% Poorly correlated | -4.12% | ||
More | ||||
SFRGY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFRGY has been loosely correlated with LVMHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFRGY jumps, then LVMHF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SFRGY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFRGY | 100% | -4.12% | ||
| LVMHF - SFRGY | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| LVMUY - SFRGY | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| CFRUY - SFRGY | 38% Loosely correlated | -3.60% | ||
| BURBY - SFRGY | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| PPRUY - SFRGY | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
More | ||||