Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRGTX vs RCGTX
PRGTX vs RCGTX Comparison
Open Charts PRGTX vs RCGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology
Price$24.71
Change+$0.14 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.31B
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C
Price$15.83
Change+$0.21 (+1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
PRGTX vs RCGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRGTX vs. RCGTX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRGTX is a StrongBuy and RCGTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRGTX has more cash in the bank: 5.31B vs. RCGTX (1.58B). PRGTX (0.00) and RCGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . PRGTX was incepted earlier than RCGTX: PRGTX (25 years) vs RCGTX (24 years). RCGTX (2.17) is less costly to investors than PRGTX (0.92). PRGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.40 vs. RCGTX (23.00). PRGTX (2500) and RCGTX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.56 vs. PRGTX (26.06). PRGTX return over 5 years is better than : 1.91 vs. RCGTX (-69.49).
| PRGTX | RCGTX | PRGTX / RCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 2.17 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 2.17 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.785 | 14.015 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.31B | 1.58B | 336% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.06 | 28.56 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.00 | -6.41 | -1,388% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.91 | -69.49 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.28 | -66.33 | -133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement