Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRGTX vs RCGTX
PRGTX vs RCGTX Comparison
Open Charts PRGTX vs RCGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology
Price$22.77
Change+$0.09 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.82B
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C
Price$14.85
Change+$0.09 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
PRGTX vs RCGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRGTX vs. RCGTX commentary
Jun 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRGTX is a Buy and RCGTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRGTX has more cash in the bank: 4.82B vs. RCGTX (1.58B). PRGTX (0.00) and RCGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . PRGTX was incepted earlier than RCGTX: PRGTX (25 years) vs RCGTX (23 years). RCGTX (2.17) is less costly to investors than PRGTX (0.92). PRGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.40 vs. RCGTX (23.00). PRGTX (2500) and RCGTX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.65 vs. PRGTX (15.00). PRGTX return over 5 years is better than : 13.40 vs. RCGTX (-65.29).
| PRGTX | RCGTX | PRGTX / RCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 2.17 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 2.17 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.156 | 8.394 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.82B | 1.58B | 305% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.00 | 16.65 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.65 | -4.87 | -1,821% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.40 | -65.29 | -21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.69 | -70.29 | -101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement