Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRGTX vs RCGTX
PRGTX vs RCGTX Comparison
Open Charts PRGTX vs RCGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology
Price$25.57
Change+$0.47 (+1.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.49B
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C
Price$16.71
Change+$0.21 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.66B
PRGTX vs RCGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRGTX vs. RCGTX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRGTX is a StrongBuy and RCGTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRGTX has more cash in the bank: 5.49B vs. RCGTX (1.66B). PRGTX (0.00) and RCGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . PRGTX was incepted earlier than RCGTX: PRGTX (25 years) vs RCGTX (24 years). RCGTX (2.17) is less costly to investors than PRGTX (0.92). PRGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.40 vs. RCGTX (23.00). PRGTX (2500) and RCGTX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.26 vs. PRGTX (31.69). PRGTX return over 5 years is better than : 10.62 vs. RCGTX (-64.89).
| PRGTX | RCGTX | PRGTX / RCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 2.17 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 2.17 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.326 | 20.438 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.49B | 1.66B | 330% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.69 | 34.26 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 106.08 | 3.25 | 3,260% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.62 | -64.89 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.76 | -65.20 | -133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement