Ad is loading...
PRGTX vs RCGTX
PRGTX vs RCGTX Comparison
Open Charts PRGTX vs RCGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology
Price$17.84
Change+$0.32 (+1.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.83B
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C
Price$11.37
Change+$0.22 (+1.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.23B
PRGTX vs RCGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRGTX vs. RCGTX commentary
Apr 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRGTX is a Buy and RCGTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRGTX has more cash in the bank: 3.83B vs. RCGTX (1.23B). PRGTX (0.00) and RCGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . PRGTX was incepted earlier than RCGTX: PRGTX (25 years) vs RCGTX (23 years). RCGTX (2.17) is less costly to investors than PRGTX (0.94). PRGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.40 vs. RCGTX (23.00). PRGTX (2500) and RCGTX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PRGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.82 vs. RCGTX (-3.73). PRGTX return over 5 years is better than : 14.65 vs. RCGTX (-65.87).
| PRGTX | RCGTX | PRGTX / RCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.17 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.17 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.477 | -17.007 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.83B | 1.23B | 312% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.82 | -3.73 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.71 | -40.44 | -29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.65 | -65.87 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.36 | -77.08 | -46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...