Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRGTX vs RCGTX
PRGTX vs RCGTX Comparison
Open Charts PRGTX vs RCGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology
Price$26.73
Change-$0.13 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.81B
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C
Price$17.18
Change-$0.05 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.72B
PRGTX vs RCGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRGTX vs. RCGTX commentary
Oct 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRGTX is a StrongBuy and RCGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRGTX has more cash in the bank: 5.81B vs. RCGTX (1.72B). PRGTX (0.00) and RCGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . PRGTX was incepted earlier than RCGTX: PRGTX (25 years) vs RCGTX (24 years). RCGTX (2.17) is less costly to investors than PRGTX (0.92). PRGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.40 vs. RCGTX (2.00). PRGTX (2500) and RCGTX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.83 vs. PRGTX (30.20). PRGTX return over 5 years is better than : 8.13 vs. RCGTX (-66.87).
| PRGTX | RCGTX | PRGTX / RCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 2.17 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 2.17 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.763 | 25.766 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.81B | 1.72B | 339% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.20 | 31.83 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 147.33 | 16.11 | 915% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.13 | -66.87 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.70 | -65.15 | -135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers