Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRGTX vs RCGTX
PRGTX vs RCGTX Comparison
Open Charts PRGTX vs RCGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology
Price$24.14
Change+$0.25 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.09B
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C
Price$15.75
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.61B
PRGTX vs RCGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRGTX vs. RCGTX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRGTX is a StrongBuy and RCGTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRGTX has more cash in the bank: 5.09B vs. RCGTX (1.61B). PRGTX (0.00) and RCGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . PRGTX was incepted earlier than RCGTX: PRGTX (25 years) vs RCGTX (24 years). RCGTX (2.17) is less costly to investors than PRGTX (0.92). PRGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.40 vs. RCGTX (23.00). PRGTX (2500) and RCGTX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.24 vs. PRGTX (36.44). PRGTX return over 5 years is better than : 7.23 vs. RCGTX (-67.07).
| PRGTX | RCGTX | PRGTX / RCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 2.17 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 2.17 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.525 | 15.036 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.09B | 1.61B | 317% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.44 | 42.24 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.88 | -10.30 | -659% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.23 | -67.07 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.74 | -68.60 | -106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement