PRMNF
Price
$1.01
Change
-$0.10 (-9.01%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
SCCO
Price
$92.96
Change
-$3.78 (-3.91%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
42 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PRMNF vs SCCO

Header iconPRMNF vs SCCO Comparison
Open Charts PRMNF vs SCCOBanner chart's image
Prime Mining
Price$1.01
Change-$0.10 (-9.01%)
Volume$40.36K
CapitalizationN/A
Southern Copper
Price$92.96
Change-$3.78 (-3.91%)
Volume$801.02K
CapitalizationN/A
PRMNF vs SCCO Comparison Chart
Loading...
PRMNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PRMNF vs. SCCO commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRMNF is a Hold and SCCO is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (PRMNF: $1.01 vs. SCCO: $92.96)
Brand notoriety: PRMNF and SCCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PRMNF: 163% vs. SCCO: 89%
Market capitalization -- PRMNF: $200.1M vs. SCCO: $82.35B
PRMNF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $200.1M. SCCO’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $82.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PRMNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCCO’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • PRMNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SCCO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCCO is a better buy in the long-term than PRMNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PRMNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCCO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PRMNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SCCO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both PRMNF and SCCO are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

PRMNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -16.53% price change this week, while SCCO (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -10.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

SCCO is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-3.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCCO($82.4B) has a higher market cap than PRMNF($200M). SCCO YTD gains are higher at: 12.918 vs. PRMNF (-9.417). SCCO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.12B vs. PRMNF (-25.13M). SCCO has more cash in the bank: 1.75B vs. PRMNF (19.2M). PRMNF has less debt than SCCO: PRMNF (153K) vs SCCO (7.03B). SCCO has higher revenues than PRMNF: SCCO (9.9B) vs PRMNF (0).
PRMNFSCCOPRMNF / SCCO
Capitalization200M82.4B0%
EBITDA-25.13M5.12B-0%
Gain YTD-9.41712.918-73%
P/E RatioN/A34.09-
Revenue09.9B-
Total Cash19.2M1.75B1%
Total Debt153K7.03B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PRMNF vs SCCO: Fundamental Ratings
PRMNF
SCCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1460
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7214
SMR RATING
1..100
9726
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4957
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10045
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCCO's Valuation (9) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRMNF (64) in the null industry. This means that SCCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRMNF’s over the last 12 months.

SCCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRMNF (72) in the null industry. This means that SCCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRMNF’s over the last 12 months.

SCCO's SMR Rating (26) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRMNF (97) in the null industry. This means that SCCO’s stock grew significantly faster than PRMNF’s over the last 12 months.

PRMNF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as SCCO (57) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that PRMNF’s stock grew similarly to SCCO’s over the last 12 months.

SCCO's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRMNF (100) in the null industry. This means that SCCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRMNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PRMNFSCCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PRMNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTV73.66-2.07
-2.73%
Fortive Corp
PBFS11.37-0.40
-3.40%
Pioneer Bancorp
SKYW99.40-3.93
-3.80%
SkyWest
THR29.39-1.21
-3.95%
Thermon Group Holdings
XGN5.52-0.28
-4.83%
Exagen

PRMNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRMNF has been loosely correlated with USAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRMNF jumps, then USAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRMNF
1D Price
Change %
PRMNF100%
-9.01%
USAS - PRMNF
41%
Loosely correlated
-5.90%
SCCO - PRMNF
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.91%
HBM - PRMNF
37%
Loosely correlated
-6.22%
FCX - PRMNF
35%
Loosely correlated
-4.70%
AAGFF - PRMNF
35%
Loosely correlated
-12.47%
More