PROM
Price
$1.20
Change
+$0.25 (+26.32%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
19.98M
SCPPF
Price
$0.32
Change
+$0.03 (+10.34%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
188.83M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PROM vs SCPPF

Header iconPROM vs SCPPF Comparison
Open Charts PROM vs SCPPFBanner chart's image
Propel Media
Price$1.20
Change+$0.25 (+26.32%)
Volume$85K
Capitalization19.98M
S4 Capital
Price$0.32
Change+$0.03 (+10.34%)
Volume$7.57K
Capitalization188.83M
PROM vs SCPPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PROM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PROM vs. SCPPF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PROM is a Hold and SCPPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (PROM: $1.20 vs. SCPPF: $0.32)
Brand notoriety: PROM and SCPPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Advertising/Marketing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PROM: 216% vs. SCPPF: 79%
Market capitalization -- PROM: $19.98M vs. SCPPF: $188.83M
PROM [@Advertising/Marketing Services] is valued at $19.98M. SCPPF’s [@Advertising/Marketing Services] market capitalization is $188.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Advertising/Marketing Services] industry ranges from $163.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Advertising/Marketing Services] industry is $4.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PROM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCPPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PROM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SCPPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PROM is a better buy in the long-term than SCPPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PROM’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCPPF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PROM’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SCPPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PROM is a better buy in the short-term than SCPPF.

Price Growth

PROM (@Advertising/Marketing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SCPPF (@Advertising/Marketing Services) price change was +11.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Advertising/Marketing Services industry was +30.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.94%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Advertising/Marketing Services (+30.52% weekly)

Making a brand known to people, garnering more clients/consumers for its product and solidifying the brand’s position in an industry – all of these are essential to a company’s growth, and that’s where marketing/advertising come in as one of the key catalysts. Advertising industry is a global multibillion-dollar business of public relations and marketing companies, media services and advertising agencies – entities that help to connect manufacturers/producers with customers. Digital media has played a big role in the growth of global advertising, and agencies invest substantially to integrate advanced technologies into their business operations. According to some estimates, the U.S. advertising industry is expected to generate revenue of $52.6 billion by 2023, up from almost $40 billion in 2015 . Omnicom Group Inc., Trade Desk, Inc. and Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. are some of the major U.S. companies in the industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCPPF($189M) has a higher market cap than PROM($20M). SCPPF has higher P/E ratio than PROM: SCPPF (57.81) vs PROM (2.07). PROM YTD gains are higher at: 216.801 vs. SCPPF (-20.525).
PROMSCPPFPROM / SCPPF
Capitalization20M189M11%
EBITDA39.8MN/A-
Gain YTD216.801-20.525-1,056%
P/E Ratio2.0757.814%
Revenue89.7MN/A-
Total Cash3.43MN/A-
Total Debt55.7MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PROM vs SCPPF: Fundamental Ratings
PROM
SCPPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5025
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
39100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3585
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCPPF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as PROM (28). This means that SCPPF’s stock grew similarly to PROM’s over the last 12 months.

PROM's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCPPF (100). This means that PROM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCPPF’s over the last 12 months.

PROM's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SCPPF (100). This means that PROM’s stock grew similarly to SCPPF’s over the last 12 months.

PROM's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCPPF (85). This means that PROM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCPPF’s over the last 12 months.

PROM's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SCPPF (100). This means that PROM’s stock grew similarly to SCPPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PROMSCPPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PROM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EVSAX25.73N/A
N/A
Allspring Disciplined US Core A
IGHSX12.59N/A
N/A
Voya Global High Dividend Low Vol Port S
DISYX23.14N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon International Stock Fund Y
FWMNX18.02N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership I
LOAGX16.36N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett International Growth F3

PROM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PROM and KDOZF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PROM and KDOZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PROM
1D Price
Change %
PROM100%
N/A
KDOZF - PROM
12%
Poorly correlated
-6.01%
SCPPF - PROM
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGPEF - PROM
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NXFNF - PROM
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKUOY - PROM
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SCPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCPPF and WPP have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCPPF and WPP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCPPF
1D Price
Change %
SCPPF100%
N/A
WPP - SCPPF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
PUBGY - SCPPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
HKUOY - SCPPF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NXFNF - SCPPF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KDOZF - SCPPF
6%
Poorly correlated
-6.01%
More