Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPCX vs RMLPX
PRPCX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPCX vs. RMLPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPCX is a Hold and RMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. PRPCX (478M). PRPCX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: PRPCX (65.50) vs RMLPX (5.21). PRPCX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: PRPCX (12 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). PRPCX (2.20) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). PRPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). PRPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMLPX: PRPCX (1000) vs RMLPX (2500). RMLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.31 vs. PRPCX (-0.32). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 232.54 vs. PRPCX (141.14).
| PRPCX | RMLPX | PRPCX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 1.10 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 1.10 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.513 | 9.757 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 478M | 1.18B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 65.50 | 5.21 | 1,257% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.32 | 2.31 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.43 | 56.60 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 141.14 | 232.54 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers