Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPCX vs RMLPX
PRPCX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPCX vs. RMLPX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPCX is a Hold and RMLPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. PRPCX (502M). PRPCX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: PRPCX (63.24) vs RMLPX (5.15). PRPCX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: PRPCX (12 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). PRPCX (2.20) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). PRPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). PRPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMLPX: PRPCX (1000) vs RMLPX (2500). PRPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.95 vs. RMLPX (6.10). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 209.95 vs. PRPCX (136.99).
| PRPCX | RMLPX | PRPCX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 1.10 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 1.10 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.459 | 3.666 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 502M | 1.15B | 44% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 63.24 | 5.15 | 1,229% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.95 | 6.10 | 229% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.27 | 55.69 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 136.99 | 209.95 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement