Ad is loading...
PRPCX vs SMFPX
PRPCX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPCX vs. SMFPX commentary
Apr 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPCX is a StrongBuy and SMFPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. PRPCX (486M). PRPCX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPCX (63.74) vs SMFPX (3.38). PRPCX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPCX (11 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). PRPCX (2.20) and SMFPX (2.13) have similar cost to investors . SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPCX (70.00). PRPCX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.00 vs. PRPCX (15.21). SMFPX (182.52) and PRPCX (181.48) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PRPCX | SMFPX | PRPCX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 2.13 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 2.13 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.532 | -4.067 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 486M | 1.2B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 63.74 | 3.38 | 1,886% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.21 | 20.00 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.26 | 39.84 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 181.48 | 182.52 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.40 | 11.13 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...