Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPCX vs SMFPX
PRPCX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPCX vs. SMFPX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPCX is a Buy and SMFPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. PRPCX (508M). PRPCX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPCX (63.09) vs SMFPX (3.42). PRPCX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPCX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). PRPCX (2.20) and SMFPX (2.15) have similar cost to investors . SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPCX (70.00). PRPCX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFPX (13.72) and PRPCX (13.07) have marching annual gain over last year. PRPCX (158.34) and SMFPX (154.53) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PRPCX | SMFPX | PRPCX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 2.12 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 2.15 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.101 | 3.086 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 508M | 1.25B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 63.09 | 3.42 | 1,844% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.07 | 13.72 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.90 | 57.39 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 158.34 | 154.53 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.74 | 55.36 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement