Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPCX vs SMFPX
PRPCX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPCX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPCX is a StrongBuy and SMFPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. PRPCX (517M). PRPCX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPCX (65.34) vs SMFPX (3.50). PRPCX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPCX (11 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). PRPCX (2.20) and SMFPX (2.15) have similar cost to investors . SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPCX (70.00). PRPCX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.39 vs. PRPCX (21.05). PRPCX (154.13) and SMFPX (147.28) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PRPCX | SMFPX | PRPCX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 2.12 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 2.15 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.226 | 3.588 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 517M | 1.29B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 65.34 | 3.50 | 1,866% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.05 | 23.39 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.20 | 63.75 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 154.13 | 147.28 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.13 | 26.62 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement