Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPCX vs SMFPX
PRPCX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPCX vs. SMFPX commentary
Oct 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPCX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.27B vs. PRPCX (512M). PRPCX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPCX (62.33) vs SMFPX (3.37). PRPCX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPCX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). PRPCX (2.20) and SMFPX (2.15) have similar cost to investors . SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPCX (70.00). PRPCX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.75 vs. PRPCX (10.58). SMFPX (185.67) and PRPCX (181.66) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PRPCX | SMFPX | PRPCX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 2.12 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 2.15 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.815 | 5.182 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 512M | 1.27B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 62.33 | 3.37 | 1,850% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.58 | 11.75 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.64 | 65.95 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 181.66 | 185.67 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.88 | 65.39 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers