Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPCX vs SMFPX
PRPCX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPCX vs. SMFPX commentary
Oct 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPCX is a Buy and SMFPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. PRPCX (486M). PRPCX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPCX (62.33) vs SMFPX (3.37). PRPCX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPCX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). PRPCX (2.20) and SMFPX (2.15) have similar cost to investors . SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPCX (70.00). PRPCX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.78 vs. PRPCX (5.19). SMFPX (160.95) and PRPCX (153.15) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PRPCX | SMFPX | PRPCX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 2.12 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 2.15 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.745 | 0.990 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 486M | 1.22B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 62.33 | 3.37 | 1,850% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.19 | 5.78 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.86 | 57.15 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 153.15 | 160.95 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.76 | 74.45 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement