Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPDX vs RLBAX
PRPDX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PRPDX vs RLBAX
PRPDX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPDX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPDX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. PRPDX (7.68B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than PRPDX: RLBAX (1.14) vs PRPDX (0.90). PRPDX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PRPDX (10 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than PRPDX (1.04). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. PRPDX (16.21). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRPDX: RLBAX (250) vs PRPDX (1000). PRPDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.66 vs. RLBAX (12.45). PRPDX return over 5 years is better than : 54.24 vs. RLBAX (30.24).
| PRPDX | RLBAX | PRPDX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.32 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.32 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.464 | 8.475 | 17% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.68B | 288B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.14 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.66 | 12.45 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.25 | 38.50 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.24 | 30.24 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.73 | 75.51 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement