Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPDX vs RLBAX
PRPDX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PRPDX vs RLBAX
Permanent Portfolio Permanent A
Price$71.37
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.61B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.27
Change+$0.10 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.25B
PRPDX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPDX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPDX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. PRPDX (5.61B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than PRPDX: RLBAX (1.15) vs PRPDX (0.59). PRPDX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PRPDX (9 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than PRPDX (1.06). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. PRPDX (22.14). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRPDX: RLBAX (250) vs PRPDX (1000). PRPDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.46 vs. RLBAX (9.30). PRPDX return over 5 years is better than : 62.46 vs. RLBAX (39.12).
| PRPDX | RLBAX | PRPDX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.31 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.31 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.278 | 12.810 | 150% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.61B | 263B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 1.15 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.46 | 9.30 | 231% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.82 | 40.19 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.46 | 39.12 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers