Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPFX vs RLBCX
PRPFX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PRPFX vs RLBCX
Permanent Portfolio Permanent I
Price$70.06
Change+$0.32 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.16B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$37.48
Change+$0.14 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.46B
PRPFX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPFX vs. RLBCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPFX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 255B vs. PRPFX (5.16B). RLBCX pays higher dividends than PRPFX: RLBCX (1.56) vs PRPFX (0.83). PRPFX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PRPFX (43 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than PRPFX (0.81). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. PRPFX (22.14). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRPFX: RLBCX (250) vs PRPFX (1000). PRPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.79 vs. RLBCX (7.72). PRPFX return over 5 years is better than : 57.09 vs. RLBCX (35.59).
| PRPFX | RLBCX | PRPFX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.89 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.89 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.079 | 10.391 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.16B | 255B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.56 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.79 | 7.72 | 256% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.36 | 34.49 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.09 | 35.59 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.61 | 70.88 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement