Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPFX vs RLBCX
PRPFX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PRPFX vs RLBCX
Permanent Portfolio Permanent I
Price$68.19
Change-$0.12 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.91B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$36.51
Change-$0.26 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.98B
PRPFX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPFX vs. RLBCX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPFX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 253B vs. PRPFX (4.91B). RLBCX pays higher dividends than PRPFX: RLBCX (1.56) vs PRPFX (0.83). PRPFX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PRPFX (43 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than PRPFX (0.81). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. PRPFX (22.14). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRPFX: RLBCX (250) vs PRPFX (1000). PRPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.41 vs. RLBCX (7.14). PRPFX return over 5 years is better than : 58.80 vs. RLBCX (35.49).
| PRPFX | RLBCX | PRPFX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.89 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.89 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.698 | 7.534 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.91B | 253B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.56 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.41 | 7.14 | 286% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.31 | 29.81 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.80 | 35.49 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.36 | 59.49 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement