Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPFX vs RLBCX
PRPFX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PRPFX vs RLBCX
Permanent Portfolio Permanent I
Price$74.07
Change+$0.54 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.61B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.85
Change+$0.17 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.1B
PRPFX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPFX vs. RLBCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPFX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. PRPFX (5.61B). RLBCX pays higher dividends than PRPFX: RLBCX (1.49) vs PRPFX (0.77). PRPFX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PRPFX (43 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than PRPFX (0.81). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. PRPFX (22.14). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRPFX: RLBCX (250) vs PRPFX (1000). PRPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.86 vs. RLBCX (9.58). PRPFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.68 vs. RLBCX (40.65).
| PRPFX | RLBCX | PRPFX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.89 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.89 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.387 | 14.659 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.61B | 266B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.49 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.86 | 9.58 | 228% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.31 | 50.48 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.68 | 40.65 | 167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.02 | 74.05 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement