Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPFX vs RLBCX
PRPFX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PRPFX vs RLBCX
Permanent Portfolio Permanent I
Price$66.11
Change-$0.20 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.65B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$35.14
Change+$0.02 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets241.02B
PRPFX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPFX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jun 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPFX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 241B vs. PRPFX (4.65B). RLBCX pays higher dividends than PRPFX: RLBCX (1.63) vs PRPFX (0.85). PRPFX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PRPFX (43 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than PRPFX (0.82). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. PRPFX (22.14). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRPFX: RLBCX (250) vs PRPFX (1000). PRPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.50 vs. RLBCX (7.28). PRPFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.04 vs. RLBCX (35.16).
| PRPFX | RLBCX | PRPFX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.89 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.89 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.037 | 3.262 | 308% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.65B | 241B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.63 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.50 | 7.28 | 268% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.26 | 20.09 | 205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.04 | 35.16 | 191% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.52 | 52.66 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement