Ad is loading...
PRPFX vs RLBFX
PRPFX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PRPFX vs RLBFX
Permanent Portfolio Permanent I
Price$62.22
Change+$2.61 (+4.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.18B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$33.53
Change+$1.63 (+5.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets228.54B
PRPFX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPFX vs. RLBFX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPFX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 229B vs. PRPFX (4.18B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than PRPFX: RLBFX (2.26) vs PRPFX (0.89). PRPFX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PRPFX (42 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PRPFX (0.82) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. PRPFX (15.26). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRPFX: RLBFX (250) vs PRPFX (1000). PRPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.12 vs. RLBFX (-3.29). PRPFX return over 5 years is better than : 61.16 vs. RLBFX (31.81).
| PRPFX | RLBFX | PRPFX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.30 | 273% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.30 | 273% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.782 | -6.886 | 11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.18B | 229B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 2.26 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.12 | -3.29 | -246% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.83 | 5.75 | 380% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.16 | 31.81 | 192% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.25 | 42.36 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...