Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPFX vs RLBFX
PRPFX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PRPFX vs RLBFX
Permanent Portfolio Permanent I
Price$66.11
Change-$0.20 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.65B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$35.46
Change+$0.03 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets241.02B
PRPFX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPFX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPFX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 241B vs. PRPFX (4.65B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than PRPFX: RLBFX (2.18) vs PRPFX (0.85). PRPFX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PRPFX (43 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PRPFX (0.82) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. PRPFX (22.14). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRPFX: RLBFX (250) vs PRPFX (1000). PRPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.50 vs. RLBFX (7.98). PRPFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.04 vs. RLBFX (38.67).
| PRPFX | RLBFX | PRPFX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.29 | 283% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.29 | 283% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.037 | 3.506 | 286% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.65B | 241B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 2.18 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.50 | 7.98 | 244% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.26 | 21.87 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.04 | 38.67 | 173% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.52 | 58.13 | 135% |