Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPFX vs RLBFX
PRPFX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PRPFX vs RLBFX
Permanent Portfolio Permanent I
Price$68.55
Change+$0.17 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.91B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.02
Change+$0.10 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.22B
PRPFX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPFX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPFX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. PRPFX (4.91B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than PRPFX: RLBFX (2.10) vs PRPFX (0.83). PRPFX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PRPFX (43 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PRPFX (0.81) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. PRPFX (22.14). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRPFX: RLBFX (250) vs PRPFX (1000). PRPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.89 vs. RLBFX (7.40). PRPFX return over 5 years is better than : 66.81 vs. RLBFX (42.34).
| PRPFX | RLBFX | PRPFX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.29 | 279% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.29 | 279% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.815 | 8.457 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.91B | 252B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 2.10 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.89 | 7.40 | 269% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.91 | 36.90 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.81 | 42.34 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.00 | 66.96 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement