Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPFX vs RLBFX
PRPFX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PRPFX vs RLBFX
Permanent Portfolio Permanent I
Price$70.06
Change+$0.32 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.16B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.82
Change+$0.13 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.46B
PRPFX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPFX vs. RLBFX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPFX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 255B vs. PRPFX (5.16B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than PRPFX: RLBFX (2.08) vs PRPFX (0.83). PRPFX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PRPFX (43 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PRPFX (0.81) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. PRPFX (22.14). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRPFX: RLBFX (250) vs PRPFX (1000). PRPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.79 vs. RLBFX (8.40). PRPFX return over 5 years is better than : 57.09 vs. RLBFX (39.12).
| PRPFX | RLBFX | PRPFX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.29 | 279% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.29 | 279% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.079 | 10.801 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.16B | 255B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 2.08 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.79 | 8.40 | 236% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.36 | 36.67 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.09 | 39.12 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.61 | 77.18 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement