Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPHX vs RLBAX
PRPHX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PRPHX vs RLBAX
Permanent Portfolio Permanent C
Price$63.34
Change-$0.27 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.65B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$34.54
Change+$0.03 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.69B
PRPHX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPHX vs. RLBAX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPHX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 238B vs. PRPHX (4.65B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than PRPHX: RLBAX (1.28) vs PRPHX (0.11). PRPHX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PRPHX (9 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). PRPHX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. PRPHX (22.14). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRPHX: RLBAX (250) vs PRPHX (1000). PRPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.17 vs. RLBAX (3.94). PRPHX return over 5 years is better than : 60.92 vs. RLBAX (33.77).
| PRPHX | RLBAX | PRPHX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.31 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.31 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.710 | 1.685 | 576% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.65B | 238B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 1.28 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.17 | 3.94 | 461% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.62 | 20.37 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.92 | 33.77 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.09 | - |