Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPZX vs RMLPX
PRPZX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPZX vs. RMLPX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPZX is a Hold and RMLPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. PRPZX (512M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: PRPZX (49.29) vs RMLPX (5.15). PRPZX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: PRPZX (12 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). PRPZX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). PRPZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMLPX: PRPZX (0) vs RMLPX (2500). PRPZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.96 vs. RMLPX (6.10). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 209.95 vs. PRPZX (157.40).
| PRPZX | RMLPX | PRPZX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.10 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.10 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.399 | 3.666 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 512M | 1.16B | 44% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 49.29 | 5.15 | 958% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.96 | 6.10 | 294% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.78 | 55.69 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 157.40 | 209.95 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.20 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers