Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPZX vs SMFPX
PRPZX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPZX vs. SMFPX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPZX is a StrongBuy and SMFPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.27B vs. PRPZX (509M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPZX (48.64) vs SMFPX (3.37). PRPZX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPZX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPZX (70.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFPX: PRPZX (0) vs SMFPX (1000). PRPZX (12.21) and SMFPX (11.65) have marching annual gain over last year. PRPZX return over 5 years is better than : 181.17 vs. SMFPX (169.55).
| PRPZX | SMFPX | PRPZX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.12 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.15 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.732 | 4.982 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 509M | 1.27B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 48.64 | 3.37 | 1,444% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.21 | 11.65 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.14 | 69.40 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 181.17 | 169.55 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.75 | 59.45 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement