Ad is loading...
PRPZX vs SMFPX
PRPZX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPZX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPZX is a Buy and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.33B vs. PRPZX (558M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPZX (5.53) vs SMFPX (4.75). PRPZX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPZX (11 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. PRPZX (40.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFPX: PRPZX (0) vs SMFPX (1000). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 52.07 vs. PRPZX (46.07). PRPZX (93.10) and SMFPX (92.29) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PRPZX | SMFPX | PRPZX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.920 | 9.047 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 558M | 1.33B | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.53 | 4.75 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.07 | 52.07 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.36 | 85.17 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.10 | 92.29 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.50 | 40.66 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...