Ad is loading...
PRPZX vs SMFPX
PRPZX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPZX vs. SMFPX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPZX is a StrongBuy and SMFPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. PRPZX (493M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPZX (49.71) vs SMFPX (3.38). PRPZX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPZX (11 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX (2.13) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPZX (70.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFPX: PRPZX (0) vs SMFPX (1000). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.27 vs. PRPZX (18.82). PRPZX return over 5 years is better than : 186.23 vs. SMFPX (170.32).
| PRPZX | SMFPX | PRPZX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.13 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.13 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.625 | -2.596 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 493M | 1.22B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 49.71 | 3.38 | 1,471% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.82 | 22.27 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.66 | 42.17 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 186.23 | 170.32 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.17 | 12.51 | 249% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...