Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPZX vs SMFPX
PRPZX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPZX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jun 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPZX is a StrongBuy and SMFPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.27B vs. PRPZX (519M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPZX (51.02) vs SMFPX (3.50). PRPZX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPZX (11 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPZX (70.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFPX: PRPZX (0) vs SMFPX (1000). SMFPX (23.74) and PRPZX (23.60) have marching annual gain over last year. PRPZX return over 5 years is better than : 140.77 vs. SMFPX (118.29).
| PRPZX | SMFPX | PRPZX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.12 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.15 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.953 | 3.292 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 519M | 1.27B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 51.02 | 3.50 | 1,457% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.60 | 23.74 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.61 | 46.83 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 140.77 | 118.29 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.95 | 24.90 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement