Ad is loading...
PRPZX vs SMFPX
PRPZX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPZX vs. SMFPX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPZX is a Buy and SMFPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. PRPZX (532M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPZX (5.53) vs SMFPX (4.75). PRPZX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPZX (11 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. PRPZX (40.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFPX: PRPZX (0) vs SMFPX (1000). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.28 vs. PRPZX (30.84). SMFPX (92.88) and PRPZX (91.23) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PRPZX | SMFPX | PRPZX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.857 | 4.173 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 532M | 1.31B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.53 | 4.75 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.84 | 37.28 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.89 | 81.49 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.23 | 92.88 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.93 | 25.05 | 159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...