Ad is loading...
PRPZX vs SMFPX
PRPZX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPZX vs. SMFPX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPZX is a StrongBuy and SMFPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.23B vs. PRPZX (503M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPZX (52.96) vs SMFPX (3.64). PRPZX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPZX (11 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPZX (70.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFPX: PRPZX (0) vs SMFPX (1000). SMFPX (18.63) and PRPZX (18.19) have marching annual gain over last year. PRPZX return over 5 years is better than : 162.92 vs. SMFPX (149.01).
| PRPZX | SMFPX | PRPZX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.12 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.15 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.481 | -1.124 | -43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 503M | 1.23B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 52.96 | 3.64 | 1,456% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.19 | 18.63 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.64 | 55.77 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 162.92 | 149.01 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.97 | 16.78 | 202% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...