Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPZX vs SMFPX
PRPZX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPZX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPZX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. PRPZX (521M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPZX (49.29) vs SMFPX (3.39). PRPZX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPZX (12 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPZX (70.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFPX: PRPZX (0) vs SMFPX (1000). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.35 vs. PRPZX (19.05). PRPZX return over 5 years is better than : 176.89 vs. SMFPX (155.34).
| PRPZX | SMFPX | PRPZX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.12 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.15 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.102 | 4.479 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 521M | 1.29B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 49.29 | 3.39 | 1,455% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.05 | 20.35 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.37 | 75.86 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 176.89 | 155.34 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.49 | 30.65 | 152% |