Ad is loading...
PRPZX vs SMFPX
PRPZX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPZX vs. SMFPX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPZX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.21B vs. PRPZX (576M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPZX (5.53) vs SMFPX (4.75). PRPZX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPZX (11 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. PRPZX (40.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFPX: PRPZX (0) vs SMFPX (1000). PRPZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 90.20 vs. SMFPX (32.13). PRPZX return over 5 years is better than : 160.63 vs. SMFPX (74.84).
| PRPZX | SMFPX | PRPZX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 89.673 | 31.123 | 288% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 576M | 1.21B | 48% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.53 | 4.75 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 90.20 | 32.13 | 281% |
| Returns for 3 years | 152.22 | 76.61 | 199% |
| Returns for 5 years | 160.63 | 74.84 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.07 | 18.54 | 534% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...