Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPZX vs SMFPX
PRPZX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPZX vs. SMFPX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPZX is a StrongBuy and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. PRPZX (504M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPZX (49.25) vs SMFPX (3.42). PRPZX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPZX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPZX (70.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFPX: PRPZX (0) vs SMFPX (1000). PRPZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.96 vs. SMFPX (13.06). PRPZX return over 5 years is better than : 173.06 vs. SMFPX (153.05).
| PRPZX | SMFPX | PRPZX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.12 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.15 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.401 | 2.487 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 504M | 1.24B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 49.25 | 3.42 | 1,440% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.96 | 13.06 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.69 | 56.48 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 173.06 | 153.05 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.08 | 54.46 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers