Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPZX vs SMRPX
PRPZX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPZX vs. SMRPX commentary
Jun 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPZX is a StrongBuy and SMRPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.27B vs. PRPZX (519M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: PRPZX (51.02) vs SMRPX (4.58). PRPZX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: PRPZX (11 years) vs SMRPX (9 years). PRPZX (1.18) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPZX (70.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: PRPZX (0) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.26 vs. PRPZX (23.60). PRPZX return over 5 years is better than : 140.77 vs. SMRPX (130.42).
| PRPZX | SMRPX | PRPZX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.02 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.05 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.953 | 3.852 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 519M | 1.27B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 51.02 | 4.58 | 1,113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.60 | 25.26 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.61 | 51.71 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 140.77 | 130.42 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.95 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement