PRRFY vs SWSSF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRRFY is a Hold and SWSSF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PRRFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSWSSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PRRFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SWSSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PRRFY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWSSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PRRFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
- SWSSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PRRFY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -6.10% price change this week, while SWSSF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.73%.
Reported Earning Dates
PRRFY is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.73% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| PRRFY | SWSSF | PRRFY / SWSSF | |
| Capitalization | 1.42B | 23.2M | 6,099% |
| EBITDA | 178M | 16.9M | 1,053% |
| Gain YTD | -1.405 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 11.76 | 83.33 | 14% |
| Revenue | 1.01B | 166M | 606% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 11.1M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 118M | - |
PRRFY | SWSSF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 98 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PRRFY's Valuation (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SWSSF (92). This means that PRRFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SWSSF’s over the last 12 months.
PRRFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SWSSF (100). This means that PRRFY’s stock grew significantly faster than SWSSF’s over the last 12 months.
PRRFY's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as SWSSF (89). This means that PRRFY’s stock grew similarly to SWSSF’s over the last 12 months.
SWSSF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as PRRFY (60). This means that SWSSF’s stock grew similarly to PRRFY’s over the last 12 months.
SWSSF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRRFY (46). This means that SWSSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRRFY’s over the last 12 months.
| PRRFY | SWSSF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 59% | 11 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 63% | 11 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 55% | 11 days ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 54% | 11 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 58% | 11 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 45% | 11 days ago 38% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 59% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 53% | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| POGRX | 35.50 | 0.20 | +0.57% |
| PRIMECAP Odyssey Growth | |||
| IIGZX | 11.88 | 0.03 | +0.25% |
| Voya Global High Dividend Low Vol Port I | |||
| ARGYX | 8.71 | N/A | N/A |
| Invesco Global Real Estate Y | |||
| FSTLX | 31.68 | N/A | N/A |
| Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value R6 | |||
| FIKKX | 10.38 | -0.01 | -0.10% |
| Fidelity Advisor Global Real Estate Z | |||
PRRFY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PRRFY and DTEAF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PRRFY and DTEAF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PRRFY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRRFY | 100% | +4.95% | ||
| DTEAF - PRRFY | 28% Poorly correlated | +9.06% | ||
| ARZTY - PRRFY | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CENTA - PRRFY | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.42% | ||
| SWSSF - PRRFY | 18% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SHVTF - PRRFY | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SWSSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SWSSF and DTEAF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWSSF and DTEAF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SWSSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWSSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| DTEAF - SWSSF | 23% Poorly correlated | +9.06% | ||
| PRRFY - SWSSF | 18% Poorly correlated | +4.95% | ||
| TATYF - SWSSF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TATYY - SWSSF | 1% Poorly correlated | -2.08% | ||
| SAPIF - SWSSF | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.51% | ||
More | ||||