PRSI vs SKTP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRSI is a Hold and SKTP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PRSI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSKTP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- PRSI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SKTP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
PRSI (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SKTP (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.56%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-0.57% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
| PRSI | SKTP | PRSI / SKTP | |
| Capitalization | 23.6M | N/A | - |
| EBITDA | 8.05M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -90.748 | 71.543 | -127% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 44.4M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 1.39M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 125M | N/A | - |
PRSI | SKTP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 68 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SKTP's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRSI (69). This means that SKTP’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRSI’s over the last 12 months.
SKTP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PRSI (100). This means that SKTP’s stock grew similarly to PRSI’s over the last 12 months.
PRSI's SMR Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as SKTP (100). This means that PRSI’s stock grew similarly to SKTP’s over the last 12 months.
SKTP's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRSI (80). This means that SKTP’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRSI’s over the last 12 months.
PRSI's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SKTP (100). This means that PRSI’s stock grew significantly faster than SKTP’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CPII | 19.64 | 0.03 | +0.15% |
| Ionic Inflation Protection ETF | |||
| VEGA | 43.58 | 0.05 | +0.12% |
| AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF | |||
| DEHP | 25.06 | 0.03 | +0.12% |
| Dimensional Em Mkts High Prof ETF | |||
| TLH | 101.70 | -0.16 | -0.16% |
| iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF | |||
| UDOW | 102.03 | -2.16 | -2.07% |
| ProShares UltraPro Dow30 | |||
PRSI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRSI has been loosely correlated with MNILY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRSI jumps, then MNILY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PRSI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRSI | 100% | N/A | ||
| MNILY - PRSI | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SKTP - PRSI | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SHALY - PRSI | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SHALF - PRSI | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MNRIF - PRSI | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SKTP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SKTP and ATAT have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SKTP and ATAT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SKTP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SKTP | 100% | N/A | ||
| ATAT - SKTP | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.42% | ||
| WTBDY - SKTP | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.29% | ||
| PRSI - SKTP | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SHALF - SKTP | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MNRIF - SKTP | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||