PRSNF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
20.95M
RTMVF
Price
$8.90
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 24 closing price
Capitalization
5.98B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PRSNF vs RTMVF

Header iconPRSNF vs RTMVF Comparison
Open Charts PRSNF vs RTMVFBanner chart's image
Personas Social
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$1.3K
Capitalization20.95M
Rightmove
Price$8.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization5.98B
PRSNF vs RTMVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PRSNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PRSNF vs. RTMVF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRSNF is a StrongBuy and RTMVF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (PRSNF: $0.05 vs. RTMVF: $8.90)
Brand notoriety: PRSNF and RTMVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Software/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PRSNF: 15% vs. RTMVF: 100%
Market capitalization -- PRSNF: $20.95M vs. RTMVF: $5.98B
PRSNF [@Internet Software/Services] is valued at $20.95M. RTMVF’s [@Internet Software/Services] market capitalization is $5.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Software/Services] industry ranges from $1.94T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Software/Services] industry is $71.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PRSNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRTMVF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • PRSNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RTMVF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, RTMVF is a better buy in the long-term than PRSNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PRSNF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PRSNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

PRSNF (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а +17.07% price change this week, while RTMVF (@Internet Software/Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Software/Services (+0.92% weekly)

Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTMVF($5.98B) has a higher market cap than PRSNF($21M). PRSNF has higher P/E ratio than RTMVF: PRSNF (147.06) vs RTMVF (22.68). PRSNF YTD gains are higher at: 13.818 vs. RTMVF (9.350). RTMVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 256M vs. PRSNF (330K). RTMVF has more cash in the bank: 43.2M vs. PRSNF (48.7K). PRSNF has less debt than RTMVF: PRSNF (482K) vs RTMVF (8.39M). RTMVF has higher revenues than PRSNF: RTMVF (349M) vs PRSNF (4.61M).
PRSNFRTMVFPRSNF / RTMVF
Capitalization21M5.98B0%
EBITDA330K256M0%
Gain YTD13.8189.350148%
P/E Ratio147.0622.68649%
Revenue4.61M349M1%
Total Cash48.7K43.2M0%
Total Debt482K8.39M6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PRSNF vs RTMVF: Fundamental Ratings
PRSNF
RTMVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1349
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10070
SMR RATING
1..100
1009
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10029
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PRSNF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as RTMVF (21). This means that PRSNF’s stock grew similarly to RTMVF’s over the last 12 months.

RTMVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as PRSNF (100). This means that RTMVF’s stock grew similarly to PRSNF’s over the last 12 months.

RTMVF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRSNF (100). This means that RTMVF’s stock grew significantly faster than PRSNF’s over the last 12 months.

PRSNF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as RTMVF (50). This means that PRSNF’s stock grew similarly to RTMVF’s over the last 12 months.

RTMVF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRSNF (100). This means that RTMVF’s stock grew significantly faster than PRSNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PRSNFRTMVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PRSNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EXI167.690.85
+0.51%
iShares Global Industrials ETF
ADVE36.08N/A
N/A
Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF
PPI17.07N/A
-0.03%
Astoria Real Asset ETF
MYMI24.40-0.01
-0.04%
SPDR SSGA My2029 Municipal Bond ETF
FLTB50.53-0.03
-0.06%
Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF

PRSNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PRSNF and CKPDY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PRSNF and CKPDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRSNF
1D Price
Change %
PRSNF100%
-23.66%
CKPDY - PRSNF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QQQFF - PRSNF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RCRUY - PRSNF
4%
Poorly correlated
-6.92%
NAPRF - PRSNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTMVF - PRSNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RTMVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RTMVF has been loosely correlated with OPNDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RTMVF jumps, then OPNDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RTMVF
1D Price
Change %
RTMVF100%
N/A
OPNDF - RTMVF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MTCH - RTMVF
30%
Poorly correlated
+10.50%
SSTK - RTMVF
23%
Poorly correlated
+6.65%
THRY - RTMVF
14%
Poorly correlated
+2.92%
PROSF - RTMVF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
More