PRSU
Price
$35.18
Change
+$0.67 (+1.94%)
Updated
Aug 12, 12:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
975.76M
79 days until earnings call
TLPFF
Price
$80.19
Change
-$2.81 (-3.39%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
4.76B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PRSU vs TLPFF

Header iconPRSU vs TLPFF Comparison
Open Charts PRSU vs TLPFFBanner chart's image
Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality
Price$35.18
Change+$0.67 (+1.94%)
Volume$600
Capitalization975.76M
Teleperformance
Price$80.19
Change-$2.81 (-3.39%)
Volume$36
Capitalization4.76B
PRSU vs TLPFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PRSU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PRSU vs. TLPFF commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRSU is a StrongBuy and TLPFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (PRSU: $34.51 vs. TLPFF: $80.19)
Brand notoriety: PRSU and TLPFF are both not notable
PRSU represents the Consumer Sundries, while TLPFF is part of the Office Equipment/Supplies industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PRSU: 105% vs. TLPFF: 12%
Market capitalization -- PRSU: $975.76M vs. TLPFF: $4.76B
PRSU [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $975.76M. TLPFF’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $4.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $173.85B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $90.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $16.75B. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PRSU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTLPFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PRSU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TLPFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PRSU is a better buy in the long-term than TLPFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PRSU’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLPFF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PRSU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TLPFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PRSU is a better buy in the short-term than TLPFF.

Price Growth

PRSU (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а +21.99% price change this week, while TLPFF (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +3.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.45%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

PRSU is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (+1.53% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

@Office Equipment/Supplies (-0.47% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TLPFF($4.76B) has a higher market cap than PRSU($976M). PRSU has higher P/E ratio than TLPFF: PRSU (36.45) vs TLPFF (7.90). TLPFF YTD gains are higher at: -5.670 vs. PRSU (-18.819). TLPFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.91B vs. PRSU (9.88M). TLPFF has more cash in the bank: 1.1B vs. PRSU (22.8M). PRSU has less debt than TLPFF: PRSU (117M) vs TLPFF (4.91B). TLPFF has higher revenues than PRSU: TLPFF (10.3B) vs PRSU (367M).
PRSUTLPFFPRSU / TLPFF
Capitalization976M4.76B20%
EBITDA9.88M1.91B1%
Gain YTD-18.819-5.670332%
P/E Ratio36.457.90461%
Revenue367M10.3B4%
Total Cash22.8M1.1B2%
Total Debt117M4.91B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PRSU vs TLPFF: Fundamental Ratings
PRSU
TLPFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7251
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63100
SMR RATING
1..100
1395
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5188
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9777
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2947

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TLPFF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRSU (92) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that TLPFF’s stock grew significantly faster than PRSU’s over the last 12 months.

PRSU's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TLPFF (100) in the null industry. This means that PRSU’s stock grew somewhat faster than TLPFF’s over the last 12 months.

PRSU's SMR Rating (13) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for TLPFF (95) in the null industry. This means that PRSU’s stock grew significantly faster than TLPFF’s over the last 12 months.

PRSU's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TLPFF (88) in the null industry. This means that PRSU’s stock grew somewhat faster than TLPFF’s over the last 12 months.

TLPFF's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as PRSU (97) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that TLPFF’s stock grew similarly to PRSU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PRSUTLPFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PRSU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TIRTX31.14N/A
N/A
Nuveen Large Cap Growth A
NQVCX54.05N/A
N/A
Nuveen Multi Cap Value C
HSMRX12.48N/A
N/A
Hartford Small Cap Value R3
ESCGX11.75N/A
N/A
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG C
FESAX10.50N/A
N/A
First Eagle Small Cap Opportunity A

PRSU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRSU has been loosely correlated with AZZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRSU jumps, then AZZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRSU
1D Price
Change %
PRSU100%
-1.48%
AZZ - PRSU
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
TNL - PRSU
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
CCL - PRSU
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
CUK - PRSU
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
RCL - PRSU
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
More

TLPFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLPFF has been closely correlated with TLPFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TLPFF jumps, then TLPFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLPFF
1D Price
Change %
TLPFF100%
-3.39%
TLPFY - TLPFF
71%
Closely correlated
-2.32%
IPHLF - TLPFF
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GFAI - TLPFF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
BV - TLPFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
PRSU - TLPFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
More