PSBQ
Price
$26.25
Change
+$0.13 (+0.50%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
UNIF
Price
$3.25
Change
+$0.08 (+2.52%)
Updated
Dec 23 closing price
Ad is loading...

PSBQ vs UNIF

Header iconPSBQ vs UNIF Comparison
Open Charts PSBQ vs UNIFBanner chart's image
PSB Holdings
Price$26.25
Change+$0.13 (+0.50%)
Volume$1.05K
CapitalizationN/A
U & I Financial
Price$3.25
Change+$0.08 (+2.52%)
Volume$37.47K
CapitalizationN/A
PSBQ vs UNIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
PSBQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PSBQ vs. UNIF commentary
Dec 26, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSBQ is a Hold and UNIF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2024
Stock price -- (PSBQ: $26.25 vs. UNIF: $3.25)
Brand notoriety: PSBQ and UNIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PSBQ: 26% vs. UNIF: 441%
Market capitalization -- PSBQ: $94.92M vs. UNIF: $60.94M
PSBQ [@Regional Banks] is valued at $94.92M. UNIF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $60.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PSBQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUNIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PSBQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UNIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PSBQ is a better buy in the long-term than UNIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PSBQ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNIF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PSBQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UNIF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UNIF is a better buy in the short-term than PSBQ.

Price Growth

PSBQ (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.31% price change this week, while UNIF (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

PSBQ is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.69% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSBQ($94.9M) has a higher market cap than UNIF($60.9M). PSBQ has higher P/E ratio than UNIF: PSBQ (7.32) vs UNIF (5.46). PSBQ YTD gains are higher at: 22.290 vs. UNIF (-69.253). UNIF has more cash in the bank: 31.1M vs. PSBQ (13.3M). UNIF has less debt than PSBQ: UNIF (10M) vs PSBQ (136M). PSBQ has higher revenues than UNIF: PSBQ (47.8M) vs UNIF (28.7M).
PSBQUNIFPSBQ / UNIF
Capitalization94.9M60.9M156%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.290-69.253-32%
P/E Ratio7.325.46134%
Revenue47.8M28.7M167%
Total Cash13.3M31.1M43%
Total Debt136M10M1,360%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PSBQ vs UNIF: Fundamental Ratings
PSBQ
UNIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8816
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
75100
SMR RATING
1..100
5297
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4686
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2992
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5035

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UNIF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PSBQ (43). This means that UNIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PSBQ’s over the last 12 months.

PSBQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as UNIF (100). This means that PSBQ’s stock grew similarly to UNIF’s over the last 12 months.

PSBQ's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNIF (97). This means that PSBQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNIF’s over the last 12 months.

PSBQ's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNIF (86). This means that PSBQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNIF’s over the last 12 months.

PSBQ's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNIF (92). This means that PSBQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PSBQUNIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
40%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PSBQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DODO.X0.1608670.007083
+4.61%
DODO cryptocurrency
THETA.X2.3698670.052506
+2.27%
Theta Network cryptocurrency
MFT.X0.0053640.000078
+1.47%
Mainframe cryptocurrency
NULS.X0.4289960.005673
+1.34%
NULS cryptocurrency
SFP.X0.741143-0.026149
-3.41%
SafePal cryptocurrency

PSBQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSBQ has been loosely correlated with TRCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PSBQ jumps, then TRCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSBQ
1D Price
Change %
PSBQ100%
+0.50%
TRCY - PSBQ
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.69%
QNBC - PSBQ
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
SFBS - PSBQ
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
FNRN - PSBQ
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBBI - PSBQ
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.35%
More

UNIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UNIF and FLG have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UNIF and FLG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNIF
1D Price
Change %
UNIF100%
N/A
FLG - UNIF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
PSBQ - UNIF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
UOVEF - UNIF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNIB - UNIF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNCFF - UNIF
2%
Poorly correlated
+4.64%
More