Advertisement
PSCI vs RUSHA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSCI is a Hold and RUSHA is a StrongBuy.
RUSHA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| PSCI | RUSHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 69% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FHCCX | 38.77 | 0.04 | +0.10% |
| Fidelity Advisor Health Care C | |||
| WWSYX | 21.29 | -0.10 | -0.47% |
| Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund Ultra | |||
| VSGAX | 103.07 | -0.67 | -0.65% |
| Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Admiral | |||
| MFLLX | 17.48 | -0.23 | -1.30% |
| Morgan Stanley Inst Inception R6 | |||
| TEPSX | 31.42 | -0.75 | -2.33% |
| ProFunds Technology UltraSector Svc | |||
PSCI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSCI has been closely correlated with NPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PSCI jumps, then NPO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PSCI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSCI | 100% | -1.23% | ||
| NPO - PSCI | 83% Closely correlated | -3.34% | ||
| UFPI - PSCI | 82% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| FELE - PSCI | 81% Closely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| RUSHA - PSCI | 80% Closely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| GTES - PSCI | 79% Closely correlated | -2.22% | ||
More | ||||
RUSHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUSHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHA | 100% | -0.85% | ||
| RUSHB - RUSHA | 85% Closely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| AN - RUSHA | 71% Closely correlated | -1.47% | ||
| ABG - RUSHA | 68% Closely correlated | -2.52% | ||
| GPI - RUSHA | 68% Closely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| PAG - RUSHA | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
More | ||||