Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSCIX vs QDARX
PSCIX vs QDARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSCIX vs. QDARX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSCIX is a Hold and QDARX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QDARX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. PSCIX (339M). PSCIX pays higher dividends than QDARX: PSCIX (4.38) vs QDARX (1.23). PSCIX was incepted earlier than QDARX: PSCIX (14 years) vs QDARX (11 years). PSCIX (1.88) is less costly to investors than QDARX (1.78). QDARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 361.00 vs. PSCIX (172.00). PSCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than QDARX: PSCIX (100000) vs QDARX (50000000). QDARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.13 vs. PSCIX (7.34). QDARX return over 5 years is better than : 30.97 vs. PSCIX (12.66).
| PSCIX | QDARX | PSCIX / QDARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.77 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.78 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.578 | 7.597 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 50000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339M | 2.07B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.38 | 1.23 | 355% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.34 | 8.13 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.16 | 17.17 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.66 | 30.97 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.69 | 89.77 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers