Ad is loading...
PSCMX vs SSGSX
PSCMX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PSCMX vs SSGSX
Putnam Small Cap Value R6
Price$14.80
Change+$1.09 (+7.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets218.96M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$40.40
Change+$3.07 (+8.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.01B
PSCMX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSCMX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSCMX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.01B vs. PSCMX (219M). PSCMX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PSCMX (0.97) vs SSGSX (0.52). PSCMX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PSCMX (11 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than PSCMX (0.78). PSCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). PSCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: PSCMX (500) vs SSGSX (2500). PSCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -17.76 vs. SSGSX (-22.84). PSCMX return over 5 years is better than : 84.98 vs. SSGSX (9.75).
| PSCMX | SSGSX | PSCMX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.26 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.26 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -18.972 | -19.599 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 2500 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219M | 5.01B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.52 | 188% |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.76 | -22.84 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.58 | -20.66 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.98 | 9.75 | 872% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.85 | -4.90 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...