Ad is loading...
PSCMX vs SSGSX
PSCMX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PSCMX vs SSGSX
Putnam Small Cap Value R6
Price$15.53
Change+$0.07 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets243.69M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$41.06
Change+$0.05 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.43B
PSCMX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSCMX vs. SSGSX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSCMX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.43B vs. PSCMX (244M). PSCMX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PSCMX (1.01) vs SSGSX (0.54). PSCMX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PSCMX (12 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than PSCMX (0.78). PSCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). PSCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: PSCMX (500) vs SSGSX (2500). PSCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.87 vs. SSGSX (-13.81). PSCMX return over 5 years is better than : 98.82 vs. SSGSX (19.87).
| PSCMX | SSGSX | PSCMX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.26 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.26 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.629 | -11.673 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 2500 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 244M | 5.43B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 0.54 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.87 | -13.81 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.80 | -12.55 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.82 | 19.87 | 497% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.63 | 5.86 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers