Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSCMX vs WCMFX
PSCMX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts PSCMX vs WCMFX
Putnam Small Cap Value R6
Price$16.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets253.21M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$3.36
Change-$0.01 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.92M
PSCMX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSCMX vs. WCMFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSCMX is a Hold and WCMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSCMX has more cash in the bank: 253M vs. WCMFX (5.92M). PSCMX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: PSCMX (0.89) vs WCMFX (0.00). PSCMX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: PSCMX (12 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). WCMFX (1.45) is less costly to investors than PSCMX (0.76). PSCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. WCMFX (15.00). PSCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMFX: PSCMX (500) vs WCMFX (100000). PSCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.32 vs. WCMFX (-76.28). PSCMX return over 5 years is better than : 57.39 vs. WCMFX (-65.29).
| PSCMX | WCMFX | PSCMX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.90 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.45 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.891 | -71.870 | 3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 253M | 5.92M | 4,271% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.32 | -76.28 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.77 | -67.31 | -15% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.39 | -65.29 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement