Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSECX vs RMFCX
PSECX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PSECX vs RMFCX
1789 Growth and Income C
Price$19.36
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.64M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
PSECX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSECX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSECX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. PSECX (32.6M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PSECX: RMFCX (1.20) vs PSECX (0.34). PSECX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PSECX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PSECX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PSECX (20.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSECX: RMFCX (250) vs PSECX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. PSECX (5.62). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.28 vs. PSECX (46.59).
| PSECX | RMFCX | PSECX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.91 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.91 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.553 | 14.779 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.6M | 113B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 1.20 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.62 | 8.11 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.84 | 43.61 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.59 | 59.28 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.65 | 93.90 | 73% |