Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSECX vs RMFCX
PSECX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PSECX vs RMFCX
1789 Growth and Income C
Price$18.84
Change+$0.06 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.46M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
PSECX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSECX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSECX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. PSECX (31.5M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PSECX: RMFCX (1.21) vs PSECX (0.35). PSECX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PSECX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PSECX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PSECX (20.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSECX: RMFCX (250) vs PSECX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. PSECX (2.11). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. PSECX (39.27).
| PSECX | RMFCX | PSECX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.91 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.91 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.380 | 12.783 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.5M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 1.21 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.11 | 6.00 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.15 | 27.94 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.27 | 52.67 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.32 | 84.73 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers