Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSECX vs RMFEX
PSECX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts PSECX vs RMFEX
1789 Growth and Income C
Price$18.15
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.25M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$58.02
Change+$0.32 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
PSECX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSECX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSECX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. PSECX (31.2M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than PSECX: RMFEX (1.58) vs PSECX (0.47). PSECX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: PSECX (14 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). PSECX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PSECX (20.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSECX: RMFEX (250) vs PSECX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.37 vs. PSECX (8.64). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 54.01 vs. PSECX (42.23).
| PSECX | RMFEX | PSECX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.62 | 327% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.62 | 327% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.547 | 6.053 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.2M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.58 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.64 | 9.37 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.07 | 18.90 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.23 | 54.01 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.88 | 77.06 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement