Ad is loading...
PSECX vs RMFEX
PSECX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts PSECX vs RMFEX
1789 Growth and Income C
Price$17.04
Change+$0.26 (+1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.51M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$53.29
Change+$0.77 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
PSECX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSECX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSECX is a StrongBuy and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. PSECX (29.5M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than PSECX: RMFEX (1.61) vs PSECX (0.48). PSECX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: PSECX (14 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). PSECX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PSECX (20.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSECX: RMFEX (250) vs PSECX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.21 vs. PSECX (1.27). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.72 vs. PSECX (42.35).
| PSECX | RMFEX | PSECX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.62 | 327% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.62 | 327% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.037 | -2.593 | 194% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.5M | 95.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 1.61 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.27 | 2.21 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.77 | 7.26 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.35 | 55.72 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.85 | 60.75 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...