Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSECX vs RMFEX
PSECX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts PSECX vs RMFEX
1789 Growth and Income C
Price$19.32
Change-$0.05 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.82M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.62
Change-$0.04 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
PSECX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSECX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSECX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. PSECX (32.8M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than PSECX: RMFEX (1.49) vs PSECX (0.39). PSECX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: PSECX (15 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). PSECX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PSECX (20.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSECX: RMFEX (250) vs PSECX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.10 vs. PSECX (6.17). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 61.31 vs. PSECX (49.18).
| PSECX | RMFEX | PSECX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.62 | 327% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.62 | 327% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.704 | 13.050 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.8M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 1.49 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.17 | 7.10 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.93 | 35.20 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.18 | 61.31 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.01 | 103.92 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement