Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSEPX vs RMFCX
PSEPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PSEPX vs RMFCX
1789 Growth and Income P
Price$19.46
Change+$0.06 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.46M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
PSEPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSEPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSEPX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. PSEPX (31.5M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PSEPX: RMFCX (1.21) vs PSEPX (1.09). PSEPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PSEPX (12 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PSEPX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PSEPX (20.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSEPX: RMFCX (250) vs PSEPX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. PSEPX (3.23). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. PSEPX (46.79).
| PSEPX | RMFCX | PSEPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.91 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.91 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.274 | 12.783 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.5M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.21 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.23 | 6.00 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.22 | 27.94 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.79 | 52.67 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.83 | 84.73 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement