Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSEPX vs RMFCX
PSEPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PSEPX vs RMFCX
1789 Growth and Income P
Price$20.06
Change-$0.04 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.88M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.25
Change+$0.07 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.76B
PSEPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSEPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSEPX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. PSEPX (32.9M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PSEPX: RMFCX (1.24) vs PSEPX (1.10). PSEPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PSEPX (12 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PSEPX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PSEPX (20.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSEPX: RMFCX (250) vs PSEPX (2000). PSEPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.95 vs. RMFCX (7.27). PSEPX (60.79) and RMFCX (58.03) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PSEPX | RMFCX | PSEPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.91 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.91 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.633 | 12.767 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.9M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.24 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.95 | 7.27 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.78 | 33.89 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.79 | 58.03 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.79 | 95.98 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers