Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSEPX vs RMFCX
PSEPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PSEPX vs RMFCX
1789 Growth and Income P
Price$19.97
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.64M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
PSEPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSEPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSEPX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. PSEPX (32.6M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PSEPX: RMFCX (1.20) vs PSEPX (1.07). PSEPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PSEPX (12 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PSEPX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PSEPX (20.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSEPX: RMFCX (250) vs PSEPX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. PSEPX (6.83). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.28 vs. PSEPX (54.55).
| PSEPX | RMFCX | PSEPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.91 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.91 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.371 | 14.779 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.6M | 113B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.20 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.83 | 8.11 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.44 | 43.61 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.55 | 59.28 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.03 | 93.90 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement