PSGFF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.02 (-22.22%)
Updated
Mar 5 closing price
Capitalization
106.83M
ZIM
Price
$13.79
Change
+$0.31 (+2.30%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.66B
25 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PSGFF vs ZIM

Header iconPSGFF vs ZIM Comparison
Open Charts PSGFF vs ZIMBanner chart's image
Precious Shipping
Price$0.07
Change-$0.02 (-22.22%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization106.83M
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
Price$13.79
Change+$0.31 (+2.30%)
Volume$3.06M
Capitalization1.66B
PSGFF vs ZIM Comparison Chart
Loading...
ZIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PSGFF vs. ZIM commentary
Apr 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSGFF is a Buy and ZIM is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2025
Stock price -- (PSGFF: $0.07 vs. ZIM: $13.79)
Brand notoriety: PSGFF and ZIM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PSGFF: 108% vs. ZIM: 43%
Market capitalization -- PSGFF: $106.83M vs. ZIM: $1.66B
PSGFF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $106.83M. ZIM’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $28.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PSGFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZIM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PSGFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZIM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZIM is a better buy in the long-term than PSGFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ZIM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ZIM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

PSGFF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ZIM (@Marine Shipping) price change was +9.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +4.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was -20.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

ZIM is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+4.05% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZIM($1.66B) has a higher market cap than PSGFF($107M). PSGFF has higher P/E ratio than ZIM: PSGFF (2.49) vs ZIM (0.77). ZIM YTD gains are higher at: -21.873 vs. PSGFF (-78.574). ZIM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.82B vs. PSGFF (3.59B). PSGFF has more cash in the bank: 2.26B vs. ZIM (486M). ZIM has less debt than PSGFF: ZIM (5.84B) vs PSGFF (8.48B). ZIM has higher revenues than PSGFF: ZIM (8.43B) vs PSGFF (5.99B).
PSGFFZIMPSGFF / ZIM
Capitalization107M1.66B6%
EBITDA3.59B3.82B94%
Gain YTD-78.574-21.873359%
P/E Ratio2.490.77322%
Revenue5.99B8.43B71%
Total Cash2.26B486M464%
Total Debt8.48B5.84B145%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PSGFF: Fundamental Ratings
PSGFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
37
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
63
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
94
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ZIM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ZIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NDVRX14.390.13
+0.91%
MFS New Discovery Value R1
IJSTX13.290.12
+0.91%
VY® JPMorgan Small Cap Core Equity S2
MIEJX35.470.29
+0.82%
MFS International Equity A
ISCSX14.350.06
+0.42%
VY® Columbia Contrarian Core S
HGHVX41.01-0.46
-1.11%
Hartford Healthcare R6

PSGFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSGFF and SOIEF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSGFF and SOIEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSGFF
1D Price
Change %
PSGFF100%
N/A
SOIEF - PSGFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTSHF - PSGFF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPBSF - PSGFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZIM - PSGFF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.30%
PTAUY - PSGFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ZIM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZIM has been loosely correlated with AMKBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZIM jumps, then AMKBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZIM
1D Price
Change %
ZIM100%
+2.30%
AMKBY - ZIM
62%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DAC - ZIM
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
GSL - ZIM
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.83%
CMRE - ZIM
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.88%
HPGLY - ZIM
45%
Loosely correlated
-3.07%
More