PSGFF
Price
$0.33
Change
+$0.14 (+73.68%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
ZIM
Price
$18.20
Change
-$0.22 (-1.19%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
89 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PSGFF vs ZIM

Header iconPSGFF vs ZIM Comparison
Open Charts PSGFF vs ZIMBanner chart's image
Precious Shipping
Price$0.33
Change+$0.14 (+73.68%)
Volume$1.62K
CapitalizationN/A
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
Price$18.20
Change-$0.22 (-1.19%)
Volume$18.21K
CapitalizationN/A
PSGFF vs ZIM Comparison Chart
Loading...
ZIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PSGFF vs. ZIM commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSGFF is a Buy and ZIM is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (PSGFF: $0.33 vs. ZIM: $18.20)
Brand notoriety: PSGFF and ZIM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PSGFF: 100% vs. ZIM: 73%
Market capitalization -- PSGFF: $509.42M vs. ZIM: $2.19B
PSGFF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $509.42M. ZIM’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $2.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $31.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PSGFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZIM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PSGFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZIM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZIM is a better buy in the long-term than PSGFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ZIM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ZIM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

PSGFF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ZIM (@Marine Shipping) price change was -4.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -3.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

ZIM is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-3.25% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZIM($2.19B) has a higher market cap than PSGFF($509M). PSGFF has higher P/E ratio than ZIM: PSGFF (11.87) vs ZIM (1.52). ZIM YTD gains are higher at: 134.756 vs. PSGFF (44.952). PSGFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.58B vs. ZIM (2.93B). PSGFF has more cash in the bank: 1.71B vs. ZIM (486M). ZIM has less debt than PSGFF: ZIM (5.84B) vs PSGFF (6.64B). ZIM has higher revenues than PSGFF: ZIM (7.47B) vs PSGFF (6.01B).
PSGFFZIMPSGFF / ZIM
Capitalization509M2.19B23%
EBITDA3.58B2.93B122%
Gain YTD44.952134.75633%
P/E Ratio11.871.52779%
Revenue6.01B7.47B80%
Total Cash1.71B486M351%
Total Debt6.64B5.84B114%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PSGFF: Fundamental Ratings
PSGFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
40
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88
SMR RATING
1..100
73
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PSGFFZIM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ZIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGCVX19.10N/A
N/A
American Century Global Small Cap Inv
ECHSX13.09-0.25
-1.87%
Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sci C
BSPPX685.89-20.82
-2.95%
iShares S&P 500 Index Investor P
ETGLX50.06-1.98
-3.80%
Eventide Gilead N
PISJX13.29-1.04
-7.28%
Columbia Pyrford International Stock R

PSGFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSGFF and SOIEF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSGFF and SOIEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSGFF
1D Price
Change %
PSGFF100%
N/A
SOIEF - PSGFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTSHF - PSGFF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
DPBSF - PSGFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZIM - PSGFF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
PTAUY - PSGFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ZIM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZIM has been loosely correlated with AMKBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZIM jumps, then AMKBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZIM
1D Price
Change %
ZIM100%
-1.19%
AMKBY - ZIM
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
DAC - ZIM
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
CMRE - ZIM
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
GSL - ZIM
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
HPGLY - ZIM
45%
Loosely correlated
-3.77%
More