PSGTY
Price
$2.90
Change
-$0.36 (-11.04%)
Updated
May 20 closing price
Capitalization
3.01B
SMID
Price
$34.93
Change
+$0.43 (+1.25%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
247.2M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PSGTY vs SMID

Header iconPSGTY vs SMID Comparison
Open Charts PSGTY vs SMIDBanner chart's image
Pt Semen Indonesia (Persero) Tbk
Price$2.90
Change-$0.36 (-11.04%)
Volume$1.12K
Capitalization3.01B
Smith-Midland
Price$34.93
Change+$0.43 (+1.25%)
Volume$1.92K
Capitalization247.2M
PSGTY vs SMID Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PSGTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PSGTY vs. SMID commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSGTY is a Hold and SMID is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (PSGTY: $2.78 vs. SMID: $34.93)
Brand notoriety: PSGTY and SMID are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PSGTY: 128% vs. SMID: 12%
Market capitalization -- PSGTY: $3.01B vs. SMID: $247.2M
PSGTY [@Construction Materials] is valued at $3.01B. SMID’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $247.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PSGTY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSMID’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PSGTY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SMID’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PSGTY and SMID are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PSGTY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMID’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PSGTY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SMID’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMID is a better buy in the short-term than PSGTY.

Price Growth

PSGTY (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SMID (@Construction Materials) price change was +10.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

PSGTY is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

SMID is expected to report earnings on May 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+2.80% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSGTY($3.01B) has a higher market cap than SMID($247M). SMID has higher P/E ratio than PSGTY: SMID (427.45) vs PSGTY (17.21). SMID (-21.435) and PSGTY (-21.654) have similar YTD gains . PSGTY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.34T vs. SMID (3.43M). PSGTY has more cash in the bank: 5.75T vs. SMID (5.85M). SMID has less debt than PSGTY: SMID (5.94M) vs PSGTY (16.38T). PSGTY has higher revenues than SMID: PSGTY (36.76T) vs SMID (57.7M).
PSGTYSMIDPSGTY / SMID
Capitalization3.01B247M1,217%
EBITDA5.34T3.43M155,594,406%
Gain YTD-21.654-21.435101%
P/E Ratio17.21427.454%
Revenue36.76T57.7M63,708,839%
Total Cash5.75T5.85M98,358,694%
Total Debt16.38T5.94M275,732,077%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PSGTY vs SMID: Fundamental Ratings
PSGTY
SMID
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10046
SMR RATING
1..100
1050
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8345
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
298
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PSGTY's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (71). This means that PSGTY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PSGTY (100). This means that SMID’s stock grew somewhat faster than PSGTY’s over the last 12 months.

PSGTY's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (50). This means that PSGTY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PSGTY (83). This means that SMID’s stock grew somewhat faster than PSGTY’s over the last 12 months.

PSGTY's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SMID (98). This means that PSGTY’s stock grew significantly faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PSGTYSMID
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PSGTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HLSCX23.840.22
+0.93%
Hartford Disciplined Equity HLS IC
TSLTX4.940.04
+0.82%
Transamerica Small Cap Value I3
OCIEX14.770.05
+0.34%
Optimum International C
BIGFX30.950.07
+0.23%
Baron International Growth Retail
TCIWX26.54-0.03
-0.11%
Nuveen International Eq Idx W

PSGTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSGTY and PPCLY have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSGTY and PPCLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSGTY
1D Price
Change %
PSGTY100%
N/A
PPCLY - PSGTY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGAFF - PSGTY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMID - PSGTY
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
IMYSF - PSGTY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THYCF - PSGTY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SMID and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMID has been loosely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMID jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMID
1D Price
Change %
SMID100%
+1.25%
BCC - SMID
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
USLM - SMID
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.31%
EXP - SMID
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
KNF - SMID
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
CRH - SMID
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
More