PSGTY
Price
$3.13
Change
+$0.23 (+7.93%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.14B
THYCF
Price
$25.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 29 closing price
Capitalization
3.13B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PSGTY vs THYCF

Header iconPSGTY vs THYCF Comparison
Open Charts PSGTY vs THYCFBanner chart's image
Pt Semen Indonesia (Persero) Tbk
Price$3.13
Change+$0.23 (+7.93%)
Volume$687
Capitalization1.14B
Taiheiyo Cement
Price$25.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization3.13B
PSGTY vs THYCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PSGTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
THYCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PSGTY vs. THYCF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSGTY is a Buy and THYCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (PSGTY: $3.13 vs. THYCF: $25.00)
Brand notoriety: PSGTY and THYCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PSGTY: 63% vs. THYCF: 81%
Market capitalization -- PSGTY: $1.14B vs. THYCF: $3.13B
PSGTY [@Construction Materials] is valued at $1.14B. THYCF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $3.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $75.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PSGTY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTHYCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PSGTY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • THYCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PSGTY is a better buy in the long-term than THYCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PSGTY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while THYCF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PSGTY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • THYCF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both PSGTY and THYCF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

PSGTY (@Construction Materials) experienced а +12.57% price change this week, while THYCF (@Construction Materials) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.34% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
THYCF($3.13B) has a higher market cap than PSGTY($1.14B). PSGTY has higher P/E ratio than THYCF: PSGTY (66.12) vs THYCF (7.36). THYCF YTD gains are higher at: -3.846 vs. PSGTY (-11.803). PSGTY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.29T vs. THYCF (146B). PSGTY has more cash in the bank: 4.1T vs. THYCF (80.8B). THYCF has less debt than PSGTY: THYCF (376B) vs PSGTY (11.38T). PSGTY has higher revenues than THYCF: PSGTY (35.38T) vs THYCF (911B).
PSGTYTHYCFPSGTY / THYCF
Capitalization1.14B3.13B36%
EBITDA2.29T146B1,567%
Gain YTD-11.803-3.846307%
P/E Ratio66.127.36898%
Revenue35.38T911B3,884%
Total Cash4.1T80.8B5,079%
Total Debt11.38T376B3,027%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PSGTY vs THYCF: Fundamental Ratings
PSGTY
THYCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4448
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10089
SMR RATING
1..100
1199
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5358
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
349
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3250

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PSGTY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as THYCF (11). This means that PSGTY’s stock grew similarly to THYCF’s over the last 12 months.

THYCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as PSGTY (100). This means that THYCF’s stock grew similarly to PSGTY’s over the last 12 months.

PSGTY's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for THYCF (99). This means that PSGTY’s stock grew significantly faster than THYCF’s over the last 12 months.

PSGTY's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as THYCF (58). This means that PSGTY’s stock grew similarly to THYCF’s over the last 12 months.

PSGTY's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for THYCF (49). This means that PSGTY’s stock grew somewhat faster than THYCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PSGTYTHYCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
10%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PSGTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
THYCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRLVX11.070.08
+0.73%
Catholic Rspnsbl Invstmnts Intl Eq Inv
RYICX117.250.70
+0.60%
Rydex Internet C
JGEFX13.130.01
+0.08%
JHancock Global Equity I
JABLX54.46-0.10
-0.18%
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Instl
WSEFX37.45-0.23
-0.61%
Boston Trust Walden Equity

PSGTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSGTY and PPCLY have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSGTY and PPCLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSGTY
1D Price
Change %
PSGTY100%
N/A
PPCLY - PSGTY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGAFF - PSGTY
4%
Poorly correlated
+157.00%
SMID - PSGTY
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
IMYSF - PSGTY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THYCF - PSGTY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

THYCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that THYCF and JHIUF have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that THYCF and JHIUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To THYCF
1D Price
Change %
THYCF100%
N/A
JHIUF - THYCF
18%
Poorly correlated
-4.62%
THYCY - THYCF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMID - THYCF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
PSGTY - THYCF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBJHF - THYCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More