Ad is loading...
PSLAX vs SSGSX
PSLAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PSLAX vs SSGSX
Putnam Small Cap Value A
Price$13.06
Change-$0.62 (-4.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets236.35M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$38.61
Change-$1.79 (-4.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.42B
PSLAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSLAX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSLAX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.42B vs. PSLAX (236M). PSLAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PSLAX (0.88) vs SSGSX (0.52). PSLAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PSLAX (26 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than PSLAX (1.18). PSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). PSLAX (6%) and SSGSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: PSLAX (500) vs SSGSX (2500). PSLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.95 vs. SSGSX (-14.20). PSLAX return over 5 years is better than : 94.07 vs. SSGSX (18.77).
| PSLAX | SSGSX | PSLAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.26 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.26 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.588 | -12.987 | 97% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 2500 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 236M | 5.42B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.52 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.95 | -14.20 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.29 | -13.85 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.07 | 18.77 | 501% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.66 | 3.07 | -184% |