Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSLAX vs SSGSX
PSLAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PSLAX vs SSGSX
Putnam Small Cap Value A
Price$14.62
Change-$0.07 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets258.77M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$41.59
Change-$0.23 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.5B
PSLAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSLAX vs. SSGSX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSLAX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.5B vs. PSLAX (259M). PSLAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PSLAX (0.92) vs SSGSX (0.54). PSLAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PSLAX (26 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than PSLAX (1.18). PSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). PSLAX (6%) and SSGSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: PSLAX (500) vs SSGSX (2500). PSLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.02 vs. SSGSX (-12.04). PSLAX return over 5 years is better than : 95.28 vs. SSGSX (22.59).
| PSLAX | SSGSX | PSLAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.26 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.26 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.581 | -10.424 | 63% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 2500 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 259M | 5.5B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.54 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.02 | -12.04 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.08 | -8.79 | -46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 95.28 | 22.59 | 422% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.47 | 7.33 | 20% |