Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSLCX vs SSGSX
PSLCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PSLCX vs SSGSX
Putnam Small Cap Value C
Price$10.75
Change+$0.07 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.81M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.47
Change+$0.28 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.79B
PSLCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSLCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSLCX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.79B vs. PSLCX (266M). PSLCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PSLCX (0.71) vs SSGSX (0.51). PSLCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PSLCX (26 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). PSLCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). PSLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). PSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: PSLCX (500) vs SSGSX (2500). PSLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.84 vs. SSGSX (-1.87). PSLCX return over 5 years is better than : 79.40 vs. SSGSX (28.53).
| PSLCX | SSGSX | PSLCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.26 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.26 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.945 | -2.671 | -35% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 2500 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 266M | 5.79B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.51 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.84 | -1.87 | -45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.44 | 1.75 | 597% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.40 | 28.53 | 278% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.04 | 15.81 | -101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers