Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSLCX vs SSGSX
PSLCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PSLCX vs SSGSX
Putnam Small Cap Value C
Price$10.19
Change-$0.03 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.55M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$43.31
Change-$0.04 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.65B
PSLCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSLCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSLCX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.65B vs. PSLCX (255M). PSLCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PSLCX (0.74) vs SSGSX (0.52). PSLCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PSLCX (26 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). PSLCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). PSLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). PSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: PSLCX (500) vs SSGSX (2500). PSLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.69 vs. SSGSX (-7.58). PSLCX return over 5 years is better than : 74.56 vs. SSGSX (24.06).
| PSLCX | SSGSX | PSLCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.26 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.26 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.403 | -6.634 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 2500 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 255M | 5.65B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.52 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.69 | -7.58 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.94 | -2.11 | -139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.56 | 24.06 | 310% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.55 | 10.08 | -204% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement