Ad is loading...
PSLCX vs SSGSX
PSLCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PSLCX vs SSGSX
Putnam Small Cap Value C
Price$9.38
Change-$0.04 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets238.06M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$40.43
Change-$0.26 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.38B
PSLCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSLCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSLCX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.38B vs. PSLCX (238M). PSLCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PSLCX (0.75) vs SSGSX (0.52). PSLCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PSLCX (26 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). PSLCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). PSLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). PSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: PSLCX (500) vs SSGSX (2500). PSLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.17 vs. SSGSX (-12.70). PSLCX return over 5 years is better than : 87.59 vs. SSGSX (25.11).
| PSLCX | SSGSX | PSLCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.26 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.26 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.342 | -12.923 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 2500 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 238M | 5.38B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.52 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.17 | -12.70 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.35 | -13.46 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 87.59 | 25.11 | 349% |
| Returns for 10 years | -26.81 | 3.15 | -852% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers