Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSLCX vs WCMFX
PSLCX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts PSLCX vs WCMFX
Putnam Small Cap Value C
Price$10.61
Change-$0.12 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.85M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$11.76
Change-$0.13 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.67M
PSLCX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSLCX vs. WCMFX commentary
Jul 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSLCX is a StrongBuy and WCMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSLCX has more cash in the bank: 264M vs. WCMFX (62.7M). PSLCX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: PSLCX (0.71) vs WCMFX (0.00). PSLCX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: PSLCX (26 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). PSLCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than WCMFX (1.45). PSLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. WCMFX (15.00). PSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMFX: PSLCX (500) vs WCMFX (100000). PSLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.62 vs. WCMFX (-12.25). PSLCX return over 5 years is better than : 84.82 vs. WCMFX (43.25).
| PSLCX | WCMFX | PSLCX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.90 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.45 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.418 | -0.751 | -189% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 264M | 62.7M | 421% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.62 | -12.25 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.34 | 17.84 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.82 | 43.25 | 196% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement