Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSLGX vs RGACX
PSLGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts PSLGX vs RGACX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders R6
Price$147.43
Change-$0.77 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.53B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.04
Change-$0.80 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.37B
PSLGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSLGX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSLGX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. PSLGX (6.53B). PSLGX pays higher dividends than RGACX: PSLGX (0.67) vs RGACX (0.07). PSLGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: PSLGX (7 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than PSLGX (0.53). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PSLGX (22.00). PSLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: PSLGX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.33 vs. PSLGX (-1.50). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 45.08 vs. PSLGX (29.73).
| PSLGX | RGACX | PSLGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.94 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.94 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.298 | 16.738 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.53B | 338B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.07 | 940% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.50 | 12.33 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.74 | 71.09 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.73 | 45.08 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 110.29 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement