Advertisement
PSORF vs YLWDF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSORF is a Hold and YLWDF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PSORF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileYLWDF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- PSORF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- YLWDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PSORF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YLWDF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PSORF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- YLWDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
PSORF (@Publishing: Newspapers) experienced а -2.53% price change this week, while YLWDF (@Publishing: Newspapers) price change was +2.94% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Newspapers industry was -3.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.07%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Publishing: Newspapers (-3.03% weekly)The newspaper publishing industry includes companies that publish and market news journals and daily/weekly newspapers. News Corporation, New York Times Company, and Gannett Co., Inc. are some of the largest newspaper publishers. Commercial ad revenue helps to cover plant and equipment costs and general and administrative expense. The popularity and distribution network of newspaper publishers could affect the fees they can charge on advertisements. In recent decades, with digital content grabbing advertising dollars, long-standing publishing companies have increasingly diversified into creating their own web-based content to stay in business.
| PSORF | YLWDF | PSORF / YLWDF | |
| Capitalization | 8.5B | 110M | 7,723% |
| EBITDA | 1.1B | 36.4M | 3,027% |
| Gain YTD | -15.446 | 0.245 | -6,302% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.93 | 11.95 | 133% |
| Revenue | 3.52B | 207M | 1,700% |
| Total Cash | 347M | 53.7M | 646% |
| Total Debt | 1.49B | 38M | 3,916% |
PSORF | YLWDF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 95 | 33 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 5 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 71 | 33 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
YLWDF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PSORF (50). This means that YLWDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PSORF’s over the last 12 months.
PSORF's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for YLWDF (100). This means that PSORF’s stock grew significantly faster than YLWDF’s over the last 12 months.
YLWDF's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PSORF (71). This means that YLWDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PSORF’s over the last 12 months.
YLWDF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as PSORF (73). This means that YLWDF’s stock grew similarly to PSORF’s over the last 12 months.
YLWDF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PSORF (80). This means that YLWDF’s stock grew significantly faster than PSORF’s over the last 12 months.
| PSORF | YLWDF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | 2 days ago 15% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 24% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 26% | 2 days ago 26% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 20% | 2 days ago 26% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 34% | 2 days ago 27% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 21% | 2 days ago 25% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 8% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DSL | 11.37 | -0.05 | -0.44% |
| DOUBLELINE Income SOLUTIONS FUND | |||
| EFAD | 41.17 | -0.27 | -0.65% |
| ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers | |||
| BINT | 27.38 | -0.23 | -0.83% |
| Bluemonte Global Equity ETF | |||
| RSST | 26.72 | -0.23 | -0.85% |
| Return Stacked® US Stocks & Mgd Futs ETF | |||
| TINT | 31.26 | -1.22 | -3.75% |
| ProShares Smart Materials ETF | |||
PSORF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PSORF and IFJPY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSORF and IFJPY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PSORF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSORF | 100% | N/A | ||
| IFJPY - PSORF | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.54% | ||
| SBSNY - PSORF | 4% Poorly correlated | -9.92% | ||
| PSO - PSORF | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
| YLWDF - PSORF | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
| RZSMF - PSORF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
YLWDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that YLWDF and DTRL have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YLWDF and DTRL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YLWDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YLWDF | 100% | +0.17% | ||
| DTRL - YLWDF | 15% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
| SBSNY - YLWDF | 2% Poorly correlated | -9.92% | ||
| PSORF - YLWDF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| STRYF - YLWDF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RZSMF - YLWDF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||