Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSTIX vs RYCBX
PSTIX vs RYCBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSTIX vs. RYCBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSTIX is a Hold and RYCBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSTIX has more cash in the bank: 96.6M vs. RYCBX (9.87M). RYCBX pays higher dividends than PSTIX: RYCBX (11.88) vs PSTIX (0.00). PSTIX was incepted earlier than RYCBX: PSTIX (22 years) vs RYCBX (25 years). RYCBX (2.60) is less costly to investors than PSTIX (0.73). RYCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSTIX: RYCBX (2500) vs PSTIX (1000000). PSTIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.27 vs. RYCBX (-27.13). PSTIX return over 5 years is better than : -36.56 vs. RYCBX (-78.99).
| PSTIX | RYCBX | PSTIX / RYCBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 2.51 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 2.60 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.145 | -23.180 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 96.6M | 9.87M | 979% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 11.88 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.27 | -27.13 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | -24.46 | -65.21 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.56 | -78.99 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | -64.18 | -96.40 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement