Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSTIX vs RYCBX
PSTIX vs RYCBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSTIX vs. RYCBX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSTIX is a Hold and RYCBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSTIX has more cash in the bank: 100M vs. RYCBX (55.9M). RYCBX pays higher dividends than PSTIX: RYCBX (11.39) vs PSTIX (0.00). PSTIX was incepted earlier than RYCBX: PSTIX (22 years) vs RYCBX (25 years). RYCBX (2.60) is less costly to investors than PSTIX (0.73). RYCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSTIX: RYCBX (2500) vs PSTIX (1000000). PSTIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.94 vs. RYCBX (-34.69). PSTIX return over 5 years is better than : -40.37 vs. RYCBX (-81.44).
| PSTIX | RYCBX | PSTIX / RYCBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 2.51 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 2.60 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.939 | -26.156 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 100M | 55.9M | 179% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 11.39 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.94 | -34.69 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | -32.69 | -72.45 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | -40.37 | -81.44 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | -66.43 | -96.83 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement