PSYCF vs WLMIY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSYCF is a Hold and WLMIY is a Sell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PSYCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWLMIY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PSYCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- WLMIY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PSYCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLMIY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PSYCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- WLMIY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PSYCF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -21.43% price change this week, while WLMIY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -3.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.12%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-2.41% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| PSYCF | WLMIY | PSYCF / WLMIY | |
| Capitalization | 7.17M | 18.1B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -3.68M | 5.16B | -0% |
| Gain YTD | -68.571 | -11.556 | 593% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 7.65 | - |
| Revenue | 71.8K | 73.4B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 1.69M | 2.44B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 60.3K | 30.7B | 0% |
PSYCF | WLMIY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 95 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 72 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WLMIY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PSYCF (68). This means that WLMIY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PSYCF’s over the last 12 months.
PSYCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIY (100). This means that PSYCF’s stock grew similarly to WLMIY’s over the last 12 months.
PSYCF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIY (98). This means that PSYCF’s stock grew similarly to WLMIY’s over the last 12 months.
WLMIY's Price Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as PSYCF (90). This means that WLMIY’s stock grew similarly to PSYCF’s over the last 12 months.
WLMIY's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as PSYCF (100). This means that WLMIY’s stock grew similarly to PSYCF’s over the last 12 months.
| PSYCF | WLMIY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 88% | 8 days ago 47% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 47% |
PSYCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PSYCF and RGF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSYCF and RGF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PSYCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSYCF | 100% | -15.38% | ||
| RGF - PSYCF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.70% | ||
| NSLYF - PSYCF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LSF - PSYCF | 18% Poorly correlated | -3.57% | ||
| WWNTF - PSYCF | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WWNTY - PSYCF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
WLMIY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that WLMIY and TYCMY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLMIY and TYCMY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WLMIY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLMIY | 100% | -1.82% | ||
| TYCMY - WLMIY | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.62% | ||
| WLMIF - WLMIY | 19% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WWNTY - WLMIY | 17% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ATPC - WLMIY | 11% Poorly correlated | -3.42% | ||
| PSYCF - WLMIY | 9% Poorly correlated | -15.38% | ||
More | ||||