PSYTF
Price
$9.46
Change
+$0.09 (+0.96%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
799.65M
PUMP
Price
$6.65
Change
-$0.07 (-1.04%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
850.86M
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PSYTF vs PUMP

Header iconPSYTF vs PUMP Comparison
Open Charts PSYTF vs PUMPBanner chart's image
Pason Systems
Price$9.46
Change+$0.09 (+0.96%)
Volume$12.68K
Capitalization799.65M
ProPetro Holding
Price$6.65
Change-$0.07 (-1.04%)
Volume$1.96M
Capitalization850.86M
PSYTF vs PUMP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PUMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PSYTF vs. PUMP commentary
Jun 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSYTF is a Hold and PUMP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 19, 2025
Stock price -- (PSYTF: $9.47 vs. PUMP: $6.65)
Brand notoriety: PSYTF and PUMP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PSYTF: 42% vs. PUMP: 124%
Market capitalization -- PSYTF: $799.65M vs. PUMP: $850.86M
PSYTF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $799.65M. PUMP’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $850.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PSYTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePUMP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PSYTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PUMP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PSYTF is a better buy in the long-term than PUMP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PUMP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PUMP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

PSYTF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -0.10% price change this week, while PUMP (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +3.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +4.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

PUMP is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+4.41% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PUMP($851M) has a higher market cap than PSYTF($800M). PUMP has higher P/E ratio than PSYTF: PUMP (10.41) vs PSYTF (8.88). PSYTF YTD gains are higher at: 0.949 vs. PUMP (-28.725). PUMP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 302M vs. PSYTF (168M). PSYTF has more cash in the bank: 185M vs. PUMP (41.1M). PSYTF has less debt than PUMP: PSYTF (13.2M) vs PUMP (149M). PUMP has higher revenues than PSYTF: PUMP (1.63B) vs PSYTF (359M).
PSYTFPUMPPSYTF / PUMP
Capitalization800M851M94%
EBITDA168M302M56%
Gain YTD0.949-28.725-3%
P/E Ratio8.8810.4185%
Revenue359M1.63B22%
Total Cash185M41.1M450%
Total Debt13.2M149M9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PSYTF vs PUMP: Fundamental Ratings
PSYTF
PUMP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3115
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5183
SMR RATING
1..100
5593
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5158
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1710
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PSYTF's Valuation (42) in the null industry is in the same range as PUMP (68) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that PSYTF’s stock grew similarly to PUMP’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as PUMP (83) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that PSYTF’s stock grew similarly to PUMP’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PUMP (93) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that PSYTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PUMP’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as PUMP (58) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that PSYTF’s stock grew similarly to PUMP’s over the last 12 months.

PUMP's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as PSYTF (17) in the null industry. This means that PUMP’s stock grew similarly to PSYTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PUMP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PUMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RRIGX20.58N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq R
SVLCX31.01N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Large Cap Value C
SMVIX20.74N/A
N/A
SEI Small Cap Value I (SIMT)
VGORX57.48N/A
N/A
Voya Large-Cap Growth R
FEXRX10.83N/A
N/A
First Eagle U.S. SMID Cap Opportunity R6

PSYTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSYTF and NINE have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSYTF and NINE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSYTF
1D Price
Change %
PSYTF100%
N/A
NINE - PSYTF
23%
Poorly correlated
+49.20%
PUMP - PSYTF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
CLB - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
ACDC - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
-8.64%
XPRO - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
More