PSYTF
Price
$9.35
Change
-$0.31 (-3.21%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
799.65M
SBOEF
Price
$33.47
Change
-$3.53 (-9.54%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
970.02M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PSYTF vs SBOEF

Header iconPSYTF vs SBOEF Comparison
Open Charts PSYTF vs SBOEFBanner chart's image
Pason Systems
Price$9.35
Change-$0.31 (-3.21%)
Volume$8.79K
Capitalization799.65M
Schoeller Bleckmann Oilfield Equipment AG
Price$33.47
Change-$3.53 (-9.54%)
Volume$800
Capitalization970.02M
PSYTF vs SBOEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PSYTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBOEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PSYTF vs. SBOEF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSYTF is a Hold and SBOEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (PSYTF: $9.32 vs. SBOEF: $33.47)
Brand notoriety: PSYTF and SBOEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PSYTF: 23% vs. SBOEF: 100%
Market capitalization -- PSYTF: $799.65M vs. SBOEF: $970.02M
PSYTF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $799.65M. SBOEF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $970.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PSYTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBOEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PSYTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBOEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PSYTF is a better buy in the long-term than SBOEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PSYTF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBOEF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PSYTF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SBOEF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBOEF is a better buy in the short-term than PSYTF.

Price Growth

PSYTF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +4.60% price change this week, while SBOEF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +1.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+1.62% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBOEF($970M) has a higher market cap than PSYTF($800M). SBOEF has higher P/E ratio than PSYTF: SBOEF (9.69) vs PSYTF (8.88). PSYTF YTD gains are higher at: -0.597 vs. SBOEF (-32.520). PSYTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 168M vs. SBOEF (144M). SBOEF has more cash in the bank: 302M vs. PSYTF (185M). PSYTF has less debt than SBOEF: PSYTF (13.2M) vs SBOEF (271M). SBOEF has higher revenues than PSYTF: SBOEF (548M) vs PSYTF (359M).
PSYTFSBOEFPSYTF / SBOEF
Capitalization800M970M82%
EBITDA168M144M117%
Gain YTD-0.597-32.5202%
P/E Ratio8.889.6992%
Revenue359M548M66%
Total Cash185M302M61%
Total Debt13.2M271M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PSYTF vs SBOEF: Fundamental Ratings
PSYTF
SBOEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7846
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6584
SMR RATING
1..100
5572
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5782
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2966
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBOEF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as PSYTF (41). This means that SBOEF’s stock grew similarly to PSYTF’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as SBOEF (84). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew similarly to SBOEF’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as SBOEF (72). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew similarly to SBOEF’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as SBOEF (82). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew similarly to SBOEF’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBOEF (66). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBOEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PSYTFSBOEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PSYTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBOEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MEMIX40.68N/A
N/A
MFS Emerging Markets Equity I
NRFNX11.31N/A
N/A
Natixis AEW Global Focused Real Estate N
DHLSX29.72N/A
N/A
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
PJNQX60.78N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources R6
MSPRX24.33N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Advantage C

PSYTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSYTF and NINE have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSYTF and NINE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSYTF
1D Price
Change %
PSYTF100%
-0.32%
NINE - PSYTF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
PUMP - PSYTF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
CLB - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
ACDC - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
-6.65%
XPRO - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.80%
More

SBOEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBOEF and SAPMY have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBOEF and SAPMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBOEF
1D Price
Change %
SBOEF100%
N/A
SAPMY - SBOEF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSYTF - SBOEF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
QSEP - SBOEF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
TAGP - SBOEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNVVF - SBOEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More