PSYTF
Price
$8.38
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
656.15M
XPRO
Price
$12.55
Change
+$0.14 (+1.13%)
Updated
Aug 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.45B
56 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PSYTF vs XPRO

Header iconPSYTF vs XPRO Comparison
Open Charts PSYTF vs XPROBanner chart's image
Pason Systems
Price$8.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$15.17K
Capitalization656.15M
Expro Group Holdings
Price$12.55
Change+$0.14 (+1.13%)
Volume$13.36K
Capitalization1.45B
PSYTF vs XPRO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PSYTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XPRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PSYTF vs. XPRO commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSYTF is a StrongBuy and XPRO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (PSYTF: $8.38 vs. XPRO: $12.41)
Brand notoriety: PSYTF and XPRO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PSYTF: 9% vs. XPRO: 96%
Market capitalization -- PSYTF: $656.15M vs. XPRO: $1.45B
PSYTF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $656.15M. XPRO’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $1.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $54.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PSYTF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileXPRO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PSYTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • XPRO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PSYTF is a better buy in the long-term than XPRO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PSYTF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XPRO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PSYTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • XPRO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XPRO is a better buy in the short-term than PSYTF.

Price Growth

PSYTF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +3.08% price change this week, while XPRO (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +10.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +3.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

XPRO is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+3.03% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XPRO($1.45B) has a higher market cap than PSYTF($656M). XPRO has higher P/E ratio than PSYTF: XPRO (20.59) vs PSYTF (12.47). XPRO YTD gains are higher at: -0.481 vs. PSYTF (-10.623). XPRO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 292M vs. PSYTF (154M). XPRO has more cash in the bank: 207M vs. PSYTF (69.3M). PSYTF has less debt than XPRO: PSYTF (15.1M) vs XPRO (213M). XPRO has higher revenues than PSYTF: XPRO (1.67B) vs PSYTF (423M).
PSYTFXPROPSYTF / XPRO
Capitalization656M1.45B45%
EBITDA154M292M53%
Gain YTD-10.623-0.4812,208%
P/E Ratio12.4720.5961%
Revenue423M1.67B25%
Total Cash69.3M207M33%
Total Debt15.1M213M7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PSYTF vs XPRO: Fundamental Ratings
PSYTF
XPRO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1317
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6162
SMR RATING
1..100
5385
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7640
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2599
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PSYTF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XPRO (70). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than XPRO’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as XPRO (62). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew similarly to XPRO’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as XPRO (85). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew similarly to XPRO’s over the last 12 months.

XPRO's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PSYTF (76). This means that XPRO’s stock grew somewhat faster than PSYTF’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for XPRO (99). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew significantly faster than XPRO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PSYTFXPRO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PSYTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XPRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USLIX75.35N/A
N/A
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth I
JVACX39.60N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Value Advantage C
FCALX12.81N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Climate Action C
FMFEX93.26N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Materials I
PVCIX12.54N/A
N/A
Palm Valley Capital Institutional

PSYTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSYTF and NINE have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSYTF and NINE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSYTF
1D Price
Change %
PSYTF100%
N/A
NINE - PSYTF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
PUMP - PSYTF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
CLB - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
ACDC - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.98%
XPRO - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
More

XPRO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XPRO has been closely correlated with HAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XPRO jumps, then HAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XPRO
1D Price
Change %
XPRO100%
+1.97%
HAL - XPRO
70%
Closely correlated
+1.92%
WFRD - XPRO
67%
Closely correlated
+3.44%
RES - XPRO
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
HLX - XPRO
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
SLB - XPRO
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.87%
More