Advertisement
PTXLF vs RCKHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PTXLF is a Hold and RCKHF is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PTXLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRCKHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- PTXLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RCKHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PTXLF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RCKHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PTXLF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
- RCKHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PTXLF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RCKHF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +21.30% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.68%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Production (-0.25% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
| PTXLF | RCKHF | PTXLF / RCKHF | |
| Capitalization | 13.8B | 749M | 1,842% |
| EBITDA | 224B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.000 | 296.970 | -5% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.58 | 18.48 | 36% |
| Revenue | 295B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 122B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 126B | N/A | - |
PTXLF | RCKHF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 61 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 34 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PTXLF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RCKHF (84). This means that PTXLF’s stock grew significantly faster than RCKHF’s over the last 12 months.
RCKHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PTXLF (76). This means that RCKHF’s stock grew significantly faster than PTXLF’s over the last 12 months.
PTXLF's SMR Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as RCKHF (93). This means that PTXLF’s stock grew similarly to RCKHF’s over the last 12 months.
RCKHF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PTXLF (79). This means that RCKHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PTXLF’s over the last 12 months.
RCKHF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PTXLF (48). This means that RCKHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PTXLF’s over the last 12 months.
| PTXLF | RCKHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 11% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 10% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 19 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 37% | 1 day ago 83% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XMHQ | 106.21 | 0.26 | +0.25% |
| Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | |||
| ZSEP | 26.38 | 0.05 | +0.20% |
| Innovator Equity Defined Prot ETF-1YrSep | |||
| ECML | 33.82 | N/A | N/A |
| Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF | |||
| LGH | 57.78 | -0.27 | -0.47% |
| HCM Defender 500 Index ETF | |||
| NOM | 10.91 | -0.14 | -1.27% |
| Nuveen Missouri Quality Municipal Income Fund | |||
PTXLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PTXLF and FARYF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PTXLF and FARYF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PTXLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTXLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| FARYF - PTXLF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PTRUF - PTXLF | 14% Poorly correlated | -2.13% | ||
| TTGXF - PTXLF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ROXIF - PTXLF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RCKHF - PTXLF | 0% Poorly correlated | +19.09% | ||
More | ||||
RCKHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RCKHF and RECAF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RCKHF and RECAF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RCKHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCKHF | 100% | +19.09% | ||
| RECAF - RCKHF | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.17% | ||
| QTEYF - RCKHF | 3% Poorly correlated | +4.63% | ||
| PTRUF - RCKHF | 2% Poorly correlated | -2.13% | ||
| TTGXF - RCKHF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PTXLF - RCKHF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||