Ad is loading...
PUKPF
Price
$7.31
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
SLLDY
Price
$9.68
Change
-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

PUKPF vs SLLDY

Header iconPUKPF vs SLLDY Comparison
Open Charts PUKPF vs SLLDYBanner chart's image
Prudential
Price$7.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$19.85K
CapitalizationN/A
Sanlam
Price$9.68
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Volume$11.85K
CapitalizationN/A
PUKPF vs SLLDY Comparison Chart
Loading...
SLLDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PUKPF vs. SLLDY commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PUKPF is a Hold and SLLDY is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (PUKPF: $7.31 vs. SLLDY: $9.68)
Brand notoriety: PUKPF and SLLDY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PUKPF: 477% vs. SLLDY: 107%
Market capitalization -- PUKPF: $38.31B vs. SLLDY: $7.6B
PUKPF [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $38.31B. SLLDY’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $7.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PUKPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLLDY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PUKPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLLDY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PUKPF and SLLDY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLLDY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SLLDY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

PUKPF (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -16.97% price change this week, while SLLDY (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -5.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.61%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-1.66% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PUKPF($38.3B) has a higher market cap than SLLDY($7.6B). PUKPF has higher P/E ratio than SLLDY: PUKPF (37.88) vs SLLDY (12.29). SLLDY YTD gains are higher at: 29.973 vs. PUKPF (-35.488). SLLDY has higher revenues than PUKPF: SLLDY (112B) vs PUKPF (-8.22B).
PUKPFSLLDYPUKPF / SLLDY
Capitalization38.3B7.6B504%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-35.48829.973-118%
P/E Ratio37.8812.29308%
Revenue-8.22B112B-7%
Total Cash1.81BN/A-
Total Debt5.08BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PUKPF vs SLLDY: Fundamental Ratings
PUKPF
SLLDY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10072
SMR RATING
1..100
9398
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8548
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
683
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLLDY's Valuation (34) in the null industry is in the same range as PUKPF (45). This means that SLLDY’s stock grew similarly to PUKPF’s over the last 12 months.

SLLDY's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as PUKPF (100). This means that SLLDY’s stock grew similarly to PUKPF’s over the last 12 months.

PUKPF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as SLLDY (98). This means that PUKPF’s stock grew similarly to SLLDY’s over the last 12 months.

SLLDY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PUKPF (85). This means that SLLDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PUKPF’s over the last 12 months.

PUKPF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLLDY (83). This means that PUKPF’s stock grew significantly faster than SLLDY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLLDY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SLLDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NNGRY23.750.22
+0.93%
NN Group NV
DTEGY30.150.07
+0.23%
Deutsche Telekom AG
LTGHY3.60N/A
N/A
Life Healthcare Group Holdings Ltd
KMTUY26.27-0.34
-1.28%
Komatsu Ltd.
NGPHF0.06-0.01
-11.11%
Northern Graphite Corp.

PUKPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PUKPF and PUK have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PUKPF and PUK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PUKPF
1D Price
Change %
PUKPF100%
N/A
PUK - PUKPF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
SLLDY - PUKPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
AAGIY - PUKPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.81%
FG - PUKPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
PIAIF - PUKPF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SLLDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLLDY and MFC have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLLDY and MFC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLLDY
1D Price
Change %
SLLDY100%
-0.12%
MFC - SLLDY
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
LNC - SLLDY
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
PUK - SLLDY
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
AAGIY - SLLDY
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.81%
PNGAY - SLLDY
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
More